PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RZG vs. BKSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RZG vs. BKSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RZG achieves a 20.35% return, which is significantly higher than BKSE's 14.19% return.


RZG

1D
1.87%
1M
0.23%
YTD
20.35%
6M
18.94%
1Y
33.26%
3Y*
18.48%
5Y*
5.24%
10Y*
9.73%

BKSE

1D
1.03%
1M
2.24%
YTD
14.19%
6M
12.98%
1Y
34.31%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RZG vs. BKSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RZG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF
20.35%10.22%9.84%19.15%-29.00%21.01%66.98%
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
14.19%13.09%9.56%22.37%-18.44%16.18%55.56%

Correlation

The correlation between RZG and BKSE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2020

0.93

The correlation between RZG and BKSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

RZG vs. BKSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RZG
BKSE

Healthcare

22.0%
11.4%

Industrials

18.2%
15.4%

Technology

16.8%
16.8%

Financial Services

15.0%
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
13.3%

Real Estate

7.6%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
3.2%

Energy

3.0%
7.0%

Communication Services

1.9%
2.2%

Basic Materials

0.4%
4.5%

Utilities

0.4%
3.4%

Healthcare

RZG
22.0%
BKSE
11.4%

Industrials

RZG
18.2%
BKSE
15.4%

Technology

RZG
16.8%
BKSE
16.8%

Financial Services

RZG
15.0%
BKSE
16.4%

Consumer Cyclical

RZG
8.8%
BKSE
13.3%

Real Estate

RZG
7.6%
BKSE
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

RZG
5.9%
BKSE
3.2%

Energy

RZG
3.0%
BKSE
7.0%

Communication Services

RZG
1.9%
BKSE
2.2%

Basic Materials

RZG
0.4%
BKSE
4.5%

Utilities

RZG
0.4%
BKSE
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RZG vs. BKSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RZG
RZG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RZG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RZG Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

BKSE
BKSE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BKSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKSE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BKSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKSE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RZG vs. BKSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RZGBKSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.33

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.87

3.67

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.94

12.77

+0.17

RZG vs. BKSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RZG Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the BKSE Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RZG and BKSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RZGBKSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.96

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.33

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.74

-0.36

Drawdowns

RZG vs. BKSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RZG drawdown since its inception was -58.52%, which is greater than BKSE's maximum drawdown of -29.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZG and BKSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RZGBKSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.52%

-29.08%

-29.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.63%

-9.40%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.73%

-26.76%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.33%

-29.08%

-9.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.09%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-9.05%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.69%

-0.11%

Volatility

RZG vs. BKSE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) at 4.38%. This indicates that RZG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RZGBKSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

4.38%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.68%

11.99%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.63%

17.58%

+1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.99%

21.44%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.65%

22.29%

+2.36%

RZG vs. BKSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RZG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BKSE's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

RZG vs. BKSE - Dividend Comparison

RZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than BKSE's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKSE
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF
1.15%1.26%1.55%1.38%1.50%1.17%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RZG
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF
0.41%0.37%0.95%1.43%1.59%0.22%0.49%0.70%0.46%0.44%0.65%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, RZG and BKSE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RZG has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to BKSE (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RZG dropped -58.52% vs BKSE's -29.08%.

On 5-year performance, BKSE leads with 7.11% vs 5.24% for RZG. On fees, BKSE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKSE has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKSE has performed better with a 7.11% return vs 5.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKSE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RZG.

BKSE has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.41% for RZG.

RZG tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Growth, while BKSE tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RZG and 0.04% for BKSE.

BKSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RZG and BKSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer