RZG vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

RZG (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RZG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Growth, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RZG returned 18.70%/yr vs -30.65%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.39, they often move in opposite directions. RZG charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

RZG vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RZG having a 28.43% return and BITI slightly higher at 28.75%.

RZG

• 1D: -1.71%
• 1M: 2.84%
• 6M: 21.78%
• YTD: 28.43%
• 1Y: 35.60%
• 3Y*: 18.70%
• 5Y*: 7.01%
• 10Y*: 10.09%

BITI

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 34.68%
• YTD: 28.75%
• 1Y: 68.34%
• 3Y*: -30.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RZG vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF	28.43%	10.22%	9.84%	19.15%	5.59%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	28.75%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between RZG and BITI is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.39

Return for Risk

RZG vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RZG

RZG Risk / Return Rank: 79
RZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
RZG Omega Ratio Rank: 67
RZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
RZG Martin Ratio Rank: 86

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 57
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RZG vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RZG	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	1.56	+0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	2.13	+0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.26	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.15	2.72	+1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.87	6.78	+7.10

RZG vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RZG Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RZG and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RZG vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RZG drawdown since its inception was -58.52%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZG and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	RZG	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.52%	-92.16%	+33.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.63%	-25.28%	+16.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.73%	-84.63%	+58.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.33%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.24%	-85.94%	+81.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.07%	-68.34%	+56.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	10.11%	-7.54%

Volatility

RZG vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) is 5.85%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that RZG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RZG	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.85%	11.38%	-5.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.34%	34.25%	-19.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.08%	44.14%	-25.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.05%	52.28%	-29.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.62%	52.28%	-27.66%

RZG vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RZG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

RZG vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

RZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.10%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF	0.44%	0.37%	0.95%	1.43%	1.59%	0.22%	0.49%	0.70%	0.46%	0.44%	0.65%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RZG and BITI in my portfolio?

RZG and BITI have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RZG or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to RZG (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RZG dropped -58.52% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, RZG or BITI?

On 3-year performance, RZG leads with 18.70% vs -30.65% for BITI. On fees, RZG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RZG has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RZG or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, RZG has performed better with a 18.70% return vs -30.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RZG or BITI?

RZG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RZG or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 0.44% for RZG.

What is the main difference between RZG and BITI?

RZG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. RZG tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Growth, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RZG and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.