PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYVNX vs. FNPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYVNX vs. FNPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RYVNX) and ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYVNX achieves a -32.34% return, which is significantly lower than FNPIX's -12.01% return. Over the past 10 years, RYVNX has underperformed FNPIX with an annualized return of -39.14%, while FNPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.21% annualized return.


RYVNX

1D
0.57%
1M
-16.08%
YTD
-32.34%
6M
-30.28%
1Y
-48.91%
3Y*
-39.56%
5Y*
-32.79%
10Y*
-39.14%

FNPIX

1D
-1.85%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-12.01%
6M
-9.13%
1Y
-2.81%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
13.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYVNX vs. FNPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYVNX
Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
-32.34%-35.24%-34.30%-57.09%65.14%-45.41%-69.71%-50.05%-9.71%-44.28%
FNPIX
ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund
-12.01%16.39%38.51%18.34%-23.84%57.11%-9.83%46.49%-17.23%27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RYVNX and FNPIX is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

-0.66

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between RYVNX and FNPIX has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.66 to -0.43, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYVNX vs. FNPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYVNX
RYVNX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
RYVNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYVNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYVNX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
RYVNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYVNX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

FNPIX
FNPIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FNPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FNPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYVNX vs. FNPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RYVNX) and ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYVNXFNPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.73

0.99

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

-0.16

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.96

-0.40

-1.55

RYVNX vs. FNPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYVNX Sharpe Ratio is -1.53, which is lower than the FNPIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYVNX and FNPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYVNXFNPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.53

-0.17

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.73

0.28

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.87

0.43

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

0.10

-0.72

Drawdowns

RYVNX vs. FNPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYVNX drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than FNPIX's maximum drawdown of -93.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYVNX and FNPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYVNXFNPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-93.14%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.02%

-22.37%

-27.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.67%

-23.21%

-56.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.82%

-37.80%

-51.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.39%

-58.23%

-41.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-15.74%

-84.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.57%

-36.22%

-53.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.13%

9.00%

+16.13%

Volatility

RYVNX vs. FNPIX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RYVNX) has a higher volatility of 9.25% compared to ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) at 4.82%. This indicates that RYVNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYVNXFNPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.25%

4.82%

+4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.49%

16.28%

+8.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.16%

21.45%

+10.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.14%

27.38%

+17.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.08%

30.65%

+14.43%

RYVNX vs. FNPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYVNX has a 2.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FNPIX's 1.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYVNX vs. FNPIX - Dividend Comparison

RYVNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.70%, while FNPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FNPIX
ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund
0.00%0.00%0.49%0.25%0.00%13.10%0.00%1.70%
RYVNX
Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund
15.70%10.62%6.03%4.56%0.00%0.00%0.25%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYVNX and FNPIX have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYVNX has higher volatility (9.25%) compared to FNPIX (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYVNX dropped -100.00% vs FNPIX's -93.14%.

FNPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYVNX and FNPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer