RYVFX vs. HWSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX).
RYVFX is managed by Royce Investment Partners. It was launched on Jun 14, 2001. HWSAX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jun 10, 2000.
Performance
RYVFX vs. HWSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RYVFX vs. HWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYVFX Royce Small-Cap Value Fund | 3.91% | 6.77% | 3.20% | 26.40% | -10.18% | 28.15% | -6.47% | 18.26% | -7.37% | 4.93% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 9.00% | 1.38% | 4.77% | 18.56% | 2.81% | 35.32% | -0.50% | 20.26% | -15.23% | 7.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYVFX achieves a 3.91% return, which is significantly lower than HWSAX's 9.00% return. Over the past 10 years, RYVFX has underperformed HWSAX with an annualized return of 7.10%, while HWSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.
RYVFX
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- YTD
- 3.91%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 23.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.02%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
HWSAX
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 18.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RYVFX vs. HWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYVFX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than HWSAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RYVFX vs. HWSAX — Risk / Return Rank
RYVFX
HWSAX
RYVFX vs. HWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYVFX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 0.78 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 1.22 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.17 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 1.17 | +0.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.82 | 4.34 | +1.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYVFX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.78 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.42 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.41 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.47 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between RYVFX and HWSAX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RYVFX vs. HWSAX - Dividend Comparison
RYVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.79%, more than HWSAX's 0.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYVFX Royce Small-Cap Value Fund | 9.79% | 10.17% | 6.03% | 8.20% | 6.02% | 5.77% | 3.92% | 3.19% | 13.14% | 3.45% | 5.59% | 19.64% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 0.64% | 0.69% | 8.19% | 1.79% | 13.39% | 0.22% | 0.63% | 4.62% | 9.45% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 11.67% |
Drawdowns
RYVFX vs. HWSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYVFX drawdown since its inception was -57.72%, smaller than the maximum HWSAX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYVFX and HWSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYVFX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.72% | -72.14% | +14.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.66% | -16.44% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.20% | -26.98% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.56% | -53.82% | +5.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.51% | -1.09% | -4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.86% | -11.03% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 4.43% | -0.20% |
Volatility
RYVFX vs. HWSAX - Volatility Comparison
Royce Small-Cap Value Fund (RYVFX) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) at 4.45%. This indicates that RYVFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RYVFX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 4.45% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.15% | 12.99% | -0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.58% | 23.99% | -1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 21.71% | -1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.48% | 24.65% | -2.17% |