PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYUIX vs. FKUTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYUIX vs. FKUTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Utilities Fund (RYUIX) and Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYUIX achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly lower than FKUTX's 3.99% return. Over the past 10 years, RYUIX has underperformed FKUTX with an annualized return of 7.58%, while FKUTX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.32% annualized return.


RYUIX

1D
-2.63%
1M
-5.75%
YTD
2.61%
6M
0.57%
1Y
9.40%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*
7.58%

FKUTX

1D
-2.75%
1M
-6.85%
YTD
3.99%
6M
2.49%
1Y
11.01%
3Y*
15.05%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*
9.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYUIX vs. FKUTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYUIX
Rydex Utilities Fund
2.61%17.90%20.25%-6.78%1.32%15.08%-4.56%19.38%4.07%11.36%
FKUTX
Franklin Utilities Fund
3.99%14.59%27.18%-4.91%1.67%18.00%-1.87%27.28%2.54%9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between RYUIX and FKUTX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.97

The correlation between RYUIX and FKUTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYUIX vs. FKUTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYUIX
RYUIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
RYUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
RYUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

FKUTX
FKUTX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FKUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FKUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYUIX vs. FKUTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Utilities Fund (RYUIX) and Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYUIXFKUTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

0.82

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.03

1.18

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.15

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

1.52

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.92

3.97

-1.05

RYUIX vs. FKUTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYUIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the FKUTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYUIX and FKUTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYUIXFKUTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.82

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.61

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.50

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.60

-0.33

Drawdowns

RYUIX vs. FKUTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYUIX drawdown since its inception was -63.29%, which is greater than FKUTX's maximum drawdown of -43.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYUIX and FKUTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYUIXFKUTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.29%

-43.59%

-19.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.97%

-8.10%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.03%

-16.35%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.28%

-22.53%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.88%

-36.56%

-0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.68%

-8.10%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.46%

-7.00%

-7.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

3.10%

+0.49%

Volatility

RYUIX vs. FKUTX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Utilities Fund (RYUIX) and Franklin Utilities Fund (FKUTX) have volatilities of 4.72% and 4.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYUIXFKUTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

4.87%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.89%

11.20%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

13.84%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.65%

16.90%

-0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.93%

18.83%

+0.10%

RYUIX vs. FKUTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYUIX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FKUTX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYUIX vs. FKUTX - Dividend Comparison

RYUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, less than FKUTX's 7.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKUTX
Franklin Utilities Fund
7.93%7.70%8.66%6.47%3.73%4.96%9.88%4.29%5.83%3.55%2.76%6.14%
RYUIX
Rydex Utilities Fund
1.82%1.87%0.67%3.16%0.81%2.61%2.17%0.91%0.00%2.61%10.04%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, RYUIX and FKUTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FKUTX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to RYUIX (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYUIX dropped -63.29% vs FKUTX's -43.59%.

FKUTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYUIX and FKUTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer