RYTRX vs. HWSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Royce Total Return Fund (RYTRX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX).
RYTRX is managed by Royce Investment Partners. It was launched on Dec 15, 1993. HWSAX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jun 10, 2000.
Performance
RYTRX vs. HWSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RYTRX vs. HWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYTRX Royce Total Return Fund | -1.01% | 2.57% | 9.96% | 24.39% | -13.59% | 25.58% | 3.84% | 23.53% | -12.68% | 13.27% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 9.00% | 1.38% | 4.77% | 18.56% | 2.81% | 35.32% | -0.50% | 20.26% | -15.23% | 7.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYTRX achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly lower than HWSAX's 9.00% return. Over the past 10 years, RYTRX has underperformed HWSAX with an annualized return of 8.61%, while HWSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.96% annualized return.
RYTRX
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -4.61%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- 7.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.72%
- 5Y*
- 4.88%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
HWSAX
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 9.00%
- 6M
- 7.38%
- 1Y
- 18.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RYTRX vs. HWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYTRX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HWSAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RYTRX vs. HWSAX — Risk / Return Rank
RYTRX
HWSAX
RYTRX vs. HWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Total Return Fund (RYTRX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYTRX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.36 | 0.78 | -0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.68 | 1.22 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.17 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 1.17 | -0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.53 | 4.34 | -2.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYTRX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | 0.78 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.42 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.47 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between RYTRX and HWSAX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RYTRX vs. HWSAX - Dividend Comparison
RYTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.11%, more than HWSAX's 0.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYTRX Royce Total Return Fund | 13.11% | 12.72% | 7.73% | 9.77% | 15.94% | 32.86% | 20.91% | 9.54% | 23.54% | 13.86% | 9.56% | 14.86% |
HWSAX Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A | 0.64% | 0.69% | 8.19% | 1.79% | 13.39% | 0.22% | 0.63% | 4.62% | 9.45% | 4.80% | 0.00% | 11.67% |
Drawdowns
RYTRX vs. HWSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYTRX drawdown since its inception was -54.24%, smaller than the maximum HWSAX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYTRX and HWSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYTRX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.24% | -72.14% | +17.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.66% | -16.44% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.31% | -26.98% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.82% | -53.82% | +13.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.89% | -1.09% | -8.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.30% | -11.03% | +4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 4.43% | +0.71% |
Volatility
RYTRX vs. HWSAX - Volatility Comparison
Royce Total Return Fund (RYTRX) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund Class A (HWSAX) at 4.45%. This indicates that RYTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RYTRX | HWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 4.45% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.08% | 12.99% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.15% | 23.99% | -1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 21.71% | -1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.16% | 24.65% | -3.49% |