PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYTNX vs. BMPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYTNX vs. BMPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTNX) and ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYTNX achieves a 20.51% return, which is significantly higher than BMPIX's 19.15% return. Over the past 10 years, RYTNX has outperformed BMPIX with an annualized return of 22.96%, while BMPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.29% annualized return.


RYTNX

1D
0.25%
1M
11.27%
YTD
20.51%
6M
19.74%
1Y
53.00%
3Y*
36.76%
5Y*
18.78%
10Y*
22.96%

BMPIX

1D
1.71%
1M
2.12%
YTD
19.15%
6M
23.02%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*
10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYTNX vs. BMPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYTNX
Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund
20.51%24.88%41.95%45.20%-39.32%55.55%20.31%62.29%-15.06%42.95%
BMPIX
ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund
19.15%9.09%-5.35%15.30%-16.22%38.93%18.27%25.13%-26.81%34.96%

Correlation

The correlation between RYTNX and BMPIX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2001

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between RYTNX and BMPIX has dropped to 0.54 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYTNX vs. BMPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYTNX
RYTNX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
RYTNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYTNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYTNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RYTNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYTNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BMPIX
BMPIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
BMPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BMPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYTNX vs. BMPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTNX) and ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYTNXBMPIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

1.04

+1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

1.56

+1.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.18

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

1.42

+1.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.09

4.04

+9.05

RYTNX vs. BMPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYTNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the BMPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYTNX and BMPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYTNXBMPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

1.04

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.14

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.32

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.17

+0.09

Drawdowns

RYTNX vs. BMPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYTNX drawdown since its inception was -86.64%, roughly equal to the maximum BMPIX drawdown of -84.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYTNX and BMPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYTNXBMPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.64%

-84.22%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.43%

-18.38%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.36%

-34.54%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.01%

-38.50%

-8.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.23%

-61.41%

+2.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.79%

+6.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.54%

-24.12%

-4.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

6.45%

-2.25%

Volatility

RYTNX vs. BMPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTNX) is 5.63%, while ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) has a volatility of 8.89%. This indicates that RYTNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYTNXBMPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

8.89%

-3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.91%

19.25%

-1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.69%

25.13%

-1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.75%

29.56%

+4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.16%

32.10%

+4.06%

RYTNX vs. BMPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYTNX has a 1.82% expense ratio, which is lower than BMPIX's 1.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYTNX vs. BMPIX - Dividend Comparison

RYTNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than BMPIX's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMPIX
ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund
1.52%1.81%0.94%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.16%0.00%
RYTNX
Rydex S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund
3.97%4.79%5.45%0.14%0.00%0.14%0.69%1.84%0.00%5.84%0.16%1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYTNX and BMPIX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMPIX has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to RYTNX (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYTNX dropped -86.64% vs BMPIX's -84.22%.

RYTNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYTNX and BMPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer