PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYSOX vs. RYGBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYSOX vs. RYGBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P 500 Fund (RYSOX) and Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund (RYGBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYSOX achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly higher than RYGBX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, RYSOX has outperformed RYGBX with an annualized return of 13.66%, while RYGBX has yielded a comparatively lower -4.64% annualized return.


RYSOX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
7.26%
6M
5.91%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
18.79%
5Y*
11.20%
10Y*
13.66%

RYGBX

1D
1.56%
1M
3.69%
YTD
0.83%
6M
0.48%
1Y
2.86%
3Y*
-4.95%
5Y*
-10.79%
10Y*
-4.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYSOX vs. RYGBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYSOX
Rydex S&P 500 Fund
7.26%15.93%22.98%24.15%-19.47%26.68%16.25%29.15%-6.01%19.53%
RYGBX
Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund
0.83%2.19%-12.81%-1.05%-40.90%-7.28%21.93%17.50%-5.20%9.93%

Correlation

The correlation between RYSOX and RYGBX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007

-0.27

The correlation between RYSOX and RYGBX shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYSOX vs. RYGBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYSOX
RYSOX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
RYSOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYSOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYSOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
RYSOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYSOX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

RYGBX
RYGBX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
RYGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
RYGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYSOX vs. RYGBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P 500 Fund (RYSOX) and Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund (RYGBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYSOXRYGBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.05

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

0.30

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.83

0.70

+9.13

RYSOX vs. RYGBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYSOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the RYGBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYSOX and RYGBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYSOX vs. RYGBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYSOX drawdown since its inception was -55.24%, smaller than the maximum RYGBX drawdown of -62.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYSOX and RYGBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYSOXRYGBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.24%

-62.42%

+7.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.06%

-9.88%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.94%

-23.25%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.45%

-55.36%

+29.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.05%

-62.42%

+28.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-58.05%

+54.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-19.59%

+11.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

4.23%

-2.17%

Volatility

RYSOX vs. RYGBX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex S&P 500 Fund (RYSOX) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund (RYGBX) at 2.91%. This indicates that RYSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYGBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYSOXRYGBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

2.91%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

7.82%

+2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.52%

11.22%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

19.68%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

19.28%

-1.18%

RYSOX vs. RYGBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYSOX has a 1.56% expense ratio, which is higher than RYGBX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYSOX vs. RYGBX - Dividend Comparison

RYSOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than RYGBX's 3.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYGBX
Rydex Government Long Bond 1.2x Strategy Fund
3.80%3.59%2.89%2.70%1.69%0.71%46.47%5.00%1.51%1.45%5.62%2.07%
RYSOX
Rydex S&P 500 Fund
2.47%2.65%1.08%0.60%1.17%1.25%13.42%0.93%1.69%4.56%0.84%4.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYSOX and RYGBX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYSOX has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to RYGBX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYSOX dropped -55.24% vs RYGBX's -62.42%.

RYSOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYSOX and RYGBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer