PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYSE vs. PFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYSE vs. PFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RYSE) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYSE achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly lower than PFIX's 11.17% return.


RYSE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
1.04%
YTD
2.52%
1Y
5.23%
3Y*
2.10%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.88%

PFIX

1D
0.46%
1M
18.26%
6M
11.37%
YTD
11.17%
1Y
7.75%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
23.80%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.65M$6.17M$16.90M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYSE vs. PFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RYSE
Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF
2.52%-3.09%12.46%9.32%
PFIX
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
11.17%0.42%35.94%28.81%

Correlation

The correlation between RYSE and PFIX is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023

0.69

The correlation between RYSE and PFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.71 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYSE vs. PFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYSE
RYSE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
RYSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYSE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
RYSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYSE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PFIX
PFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
PFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYSE vs. PFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RYSE) and Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYSEPFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.07

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

0.33

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.07

0.50

+1.57

RYSE vs. PFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is higher than the PFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYSE and PFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYSE vs. PFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYSE drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, smaller than the maximum PFIX drawdown of -36.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYSE and PFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYSEPFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.70%

-36.17%

+16.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.06%

-23.71%

+16.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

-36.17%

+16.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.83%

-8.34%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-17.19%

+8.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

15.40%

-12.87%

Volatility

RYSE vs. PFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RYSE) is 0.00%, while Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF (PFIX) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that RYSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYSEPFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

7.75%

-7.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.77%

21.85%

-16.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.06%

28.94%

-19.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

38.62%

-24.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.56%

38.12%

-23.56%

RYSE vs. PFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYSE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PFIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYSE vs. PFIX - Dividend Comparison

RYSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than PFIX's 7.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
PFIX
Simplify Interest Rate Hedge ETF
7.78%9.92%3.40%87.92%0.63%0.00%
RYSE
Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF
0.93%1.86%2.58%24.91%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYSE and PFIX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFIX has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to RYSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYSE dropped -19.70% vs PFIX's -36.17%.

On 3-year performance, PFIX leads with 14.25% vs 2.10% for RYSE. On fees, PFIX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RYSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PFIX has performed better with a 14.25% return vs 2.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PFIX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for RYSE.

PFIX has the higher dividend yield at 7.78%, compared with 0.93% for RYSE.

RYSE is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while PFIX is Inverse Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vest and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for RYSE and 0.50% for PFIX.

RYSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYSE and PFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer