PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYRRX vs. RYCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYRRX vs. RYCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYRRX achieves a 16.29% return, which is significantly lower than RYCKX's 20.98% return. Over the past 10 years, RYRRX has outperformed RYCKX with an annualized return of 9.21%, while RYCKX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.24% annualized return.


RYRRX

1D
-1.33%
1M
1.83%
YTD
16.29%
6M
13.99%
1Y
37.21%
3Y*
16.14%
5Y*
4.59%
10Y*
9.21%

RYCKX

1D
0.59%
1M
4.38%
YTD
20.98%
6M
19.73%
1Y
30.25%
3Y*
17.98%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
8.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYRRX vs. RYCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYRRX
Rydex Russell 2000 Fund
16.29%10.88%9.72%15.17%-21.70%13.23%17.81%23.57%-12.58%12.88%
RYCKX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund
20.98%6.61%15.10%13.97%-23.05%11.26%29.72%14.60%-15.17%18.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RYRRX and RYCKX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.92

The correlation between RYRRX and RYCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYRRX vs. RYCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYRRX
RYRRX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RYRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RYRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

RYCKX
RYCKX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
RYCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYRRX vs. RYCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX) and Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYRRXRYCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.89

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.46

11.62

-0.16

RYRRX vs. RYCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYRRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the RYCKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYRRX and RYCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYRRXRYCKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.65

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.28

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.36

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.35

-0.09

Drawdowns

RYRRX vs. RYCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYRRX drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, which is greater than RYCKX's maximum drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYRRX and RYCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYRRXRYCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.36%

-52.60%

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-10.50%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.03%

-27.14%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.02%

-35.98%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.84%

-44.75%

+1.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

0.00%

-1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.23%

-9.51%

-2.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

2.60%

+0.63%

Volatility

RYRRX vs. RYCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Russell 2000 Fund (RYRRX) is 5.79%, while Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that RYRRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYRRXRYCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

6.41%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

14.62%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.18%

18.35%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.57%

22.77%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.45%

23.06%

+0.39%

RYRRX vs. RYCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYRRX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is lower than RYCKX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYRRX vs. RYCKX - Dividend Comparison

RYRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while RYCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYCKX
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%20.92%0.00%14.34%13.66%1.29%0.00%18.93%7.60%1.72%5.90%
RYRRX
Rydex Russell 2000 Fund
0.56%0.65%1.02%0.19%0.00%12.84%0.00%1.46%0.00%4.82%0.00%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYRRX and RYCKX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYCKX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to RYRRX (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYRRX dropped -60.36% vs RYCKX's -52.60%.

RYRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYRRX and RYCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer