PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYOCX vs. SAOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYOCX vs. SAOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) and Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYOCX achieves a 17.77% return, which is significantly higher than SAOAX's 15.47% return. Over the past 10 years, RYOCX has outperformed SAOAX with an annualized return of 20.35%, while SAOAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.69% annualized return.


RYOCX

1D
0.32%
1M
0.58%
6M
15.33%
YTD
17.77%
1Y
30.18%
3Y*
24.81%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
20.35%

SAOAX

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.75%
6M
13.73%
YTD
15.47%
1Y
17.05%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
3.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYOCX vs. SAOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYOCX
Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class
17.77%19.51%24.34%53.31%-33.34%25.85%46.80%40.33%-1.36%31.20%
SAOAX
Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund
15.47%-2.00%10.49%8.81%-8.66%14.38%0.17%-2.26%-11.25%7.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RYOCX and SAOAX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2004

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between RYOCX and SAOAX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYOCX vs. SAOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYOCX
RYOCX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RYOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RYOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SAOAX
SAOAX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SAOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SAOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYOCX vs. SAOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) and Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYOCXSAOAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.31

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.73

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.69

9.73

-1.05

RYOCX vs. SAOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYOCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the SAOAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYOCX and SAOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYOCX vs. SAOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYOCX drawdown since its inception was -83.75%, which is greater than SAOAX's maximum drawdown of -52.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYOCX and SAOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYOCXSAOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.75%

-52.28%

-31.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-5.90%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.97%

-35.90%

+12.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.04%

-35.90%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.04%

-35.90%

-2.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.78%

-2.50%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.79%

-8.68%

-23.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

1.68%

+1.77%

Volatility

RYOCX vs. SAOAX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund (SAOAX) at 3.94%. This indicates that RYOCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYOCXSAOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.45%

3.94%

+4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.17%

7.34%

+7.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.44%

9.31%

+9.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.14%

28.75%

-5.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.75%

21.18%

+1.57%

RYOCX vs. SAOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYOCX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than SAOAX's 1.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYOCX vs. SAOAX - Dividend Comparison

RYOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than SAOAX's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYOCX
Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class
3.63%4.28%7.23%0.00%8.82%4.47%4.17%3.80%1.86%6.00%1.75%2.03%
SAOAX
Guggenheim Alpha Opportunity Fund
0.62%0.71%1.06%0.62%0.72%0.82%1.22%0.92%1.17%7.07%0.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYOCX and SAOAX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYOCX has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to SAOAX (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYOCX dropped -83.75% vs SAOAX's -52.28%.

SAOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYOCX and SAOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer