PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYOCX vs. GIUSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYOCX vs. GIUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) and Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYOCX achieves a 20.78% return, which is significantly higher than GIUSX's 0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, RYOCX has outperformed GIUSX with an annualized return of 20.83%, while GIUSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.64% annualized return.


RYOCX

1D
-0.30%
1M
9.09%
YTD
20.78%
6M
19.15%
1Y
39.97%
3Y*
27.47%
5Y*
16.70%
10Y*
20.83%

GIUSX

1D
-0.25%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.34%
6M
0.56%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
4.87%
5Y*
0.14%
10Y*
2.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYOCX vs. GIUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYOCX
Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class
20.78%19.51%24.34%53.31%-33.34%25.85%46.80%40.33%-1.36%31.20%
GIUSX
Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class
0.34%7.86%2.91%7.07%-16.63%-0.90%14.63%4.47%1.20%6.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RYOCX and GIUSX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

-0.00

The correlation between RYOCX and GIUSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYOCX vs. GIUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYOCX
RYOCX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RYOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
RYOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

GIUSX
GIUSX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GIUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GIUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYOCX vs. GIUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) and Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYOCXGIUSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.26

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

1.95

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.48

5.95

+6.53

RYOCX vs. GIUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYOCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the GIUSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYOCX and GIUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYOCXGIUSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

1.43

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.02

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.55

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.70

-0.15

Drawdowns

RYOCX vs. GIUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYOCX drawdown since its inception was -83.75%, which is greater than GIUSX's maximum drawdown of -22.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYOCX and GIUSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYOCXGIUSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.75%

-22.02%

-61.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-2.99%

-9.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.97%

-6.10%

-16.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.04%

-22.02%

-16.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.04%

-22.02%

-16.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-1.87%

+1.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.88%

-4.09%

-27.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

0.97%

+2.27%

Volatility

RYOCX vs. GIUSX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX) at 1.46%. This indicates that RYOCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYOCXGIUSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

1.46%

+3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.18%

2.97%

+9.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

4.07%

+12.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.77%

5.91%

+16.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.62%

4.83%

+17.79%

RYOCX vs. GIUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYOCX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than GIUSX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYOCX vs. GIUSX - Dividend Comparison

RYOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than GIUSX's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIUSX
Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class
4.80%4.75%4.68%4.39%2.71%3.36%4.36%2.42%2.76%3.47%3.85%4.96%
RYOCX
Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class
3.54%4.28%7.23%0.00%8.82%4.47%4.17%3.80%1.86%6.00%1.75%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYOCX and GIUSX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYOCX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to GIUSX (1.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYOCX dropped -83.75% vs GIUSX's -22.02%.

RYOCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYOCX and GIUSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer