RYOCX vs. AMRGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX).
RYOCX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Feb 14, 1994. AMRGX is managed by American Growth. It was launched on Jul 31, 1958.
Performance
RYOCX vs. AMRGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RYOCX vs. AMRGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYOCX Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class | -9.21% | 19.51% | 24.34% | 53.31% | -33.34% | 25.85% | 46.80% | 40.33% | -1.36% | 31.20% |
AMRGX American Growth Fund Series One | -1.31% | 11.18% | 16.61% | 24.38% | -19.93% | 15.64% | 18.65% | 36.73% | -9.07% | 13.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYOCX achieves a -9.21% return, which is significantly lower than AMRGX's -1.31% return. Over the past 10 years, RYOCX has outperformed AMRGX with an annualized return of 17.39%, while AMRGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.41% annualized return.
RYOCX
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- -9.21%
- 6M
- -7.26%
- 1Y
- 18.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 11.33%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
AMRGX
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -10.92%
- YTD
- -1.31%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 16.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RYOCX vs. AMRGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYOCX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than AMRGX's 4.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RYOCX vs. AMRGX — Risk / Return Rank
RYOCX
AMRGX
RYOCX vs. AMRGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) and American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYOCX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 0.62 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.12 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 0.99 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 2.37 | +2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYOCX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.62 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.34 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.49 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.10 | +0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between RYOCX and AMRGX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RYOCX vs. AMRGX - Dividend Comparison
RYOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, less than AMRGX's 18.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYOCX Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class | 4.71% | 4.28% | 7.23% | 0.00% | 8.82% | 4.47% | 4.17% | 3.80% | 1.86% | 6.00% | 1.75% | 2.03% |
AMRGX American Growth Fund Series One | 18.06% | 17.82% | 12.39% | 8.17% | 7.77% | 12.21% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RYOCX vs. AMRGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYOCX drawdown since its inception was -83.75%, roughly equal to the maximum AMRGX drawdown of -80.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYOCX and AMRGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYOCX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.75% | -80.32% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -13.98% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.04% | -35.42% | -2.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.04% | -35.42% | -2.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.31% | -13.98% | +1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.05% | -40.45% | +8.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 5.82% | -2.35% |
Volatility
RYOCX vs. AMRGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) is 5.40%, while American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that RYOCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMRGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RYOCX | AMRGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 6.18% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.43% | 23.49% | -11.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.54% | 28.26% | -5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 21.84% | +0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 21.30% | +1.25% |