RYOCX vs. QQQJ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RYOCX (Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class) and QQQJ (Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) are both funds - RYOCX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while QQQJ is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RYOCX returned 16.12%/yr vs 6.66%/yr for QQQJ. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYOCX charges 1.24%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQJ.

Performance

RYOCX vs. QQQJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) and Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYOCX achieves a 20.12% return, which is significantly lower than QQQJ's 21.43% return.

RYOCX

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: 3.11%
• YTD: 20.12%
• 6M: 19.09%
• 1Y: 39.80%
• 3Y*: 25.73%
• 5Y*: 16.12%
• 10Y*: 21.06%

QQQJ

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 21.43%
• 6M: 18.32%
• 1Y: 44.44%
• 3Y*: 21.75%
• 5Y*: 6.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYOCX vs. QQQJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RYOCX Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class	20.12%	19.51%	24.34%	53.31%	-33.34%	25.85%	6.48%
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	21.43%	20.44%	15.36%	13.68%	-28.25%	9.76%	15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between RYOCX and QQQJ is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.81

The correlation between RYOCX and QQQJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RYOCX vs. QQQJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYOCX

RYOCX Risk / Return Rank: 65
RYOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
RYOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
RYOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
RYOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RYOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

QQQJ

QQQJ Risk / Return Rank: 76
QQQJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
QQQJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
QQQJ Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QQQJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
QQQJ Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYOCX vs. QQQJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) and Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RYOCX	QQQJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	2.36	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.91	3.12	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.41	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	3.77	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.78	15.67	-3.89

RYOCX vs. QQQJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYOCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the QQQJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYOCX and QQQJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RYOCX vs. QQQJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYOCX drawdown since its inception was -83.75%, which is greater than QQQJ's maximum drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYOCX and QQQJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYOCX	QQQJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.75%	-39.57%	-44.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.31%	-11.84%	-0.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.97%	-22.46%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.04%	-39.57%	+1.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.84%	-2.13%	+1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.84%	-15.63%	-16.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	2.84%	+0.50%

Volatility

RYOCX vs. QQQJ - Volatility Comparison

Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class (RYOCX) has a higher volatility of 8.49% compared to Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) at 7.13%. This indicates that RYOCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYOCX	QQQJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.49%	7.13%	+1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.35%	15.65%	-1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.71%	18.99%	-1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.01%	22.17%	+0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.74%	22.11%	+0.63%

RYOCX vs. QQQJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYOCX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQJ's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

RYOCX vs. QQQJ - Dividend Comparison

RYOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than QQQJ's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	0.75%	0.85%	0.77%	0.67%	0.76%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RYOCX Rydex NASDAQ-100 Fund Investor Class	3.56%	4.28%	7.23%	0.00%	8.82%	4.47%	4.17%	3.80%	1.86%	6.00%	1.75%	2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYOCX and QQQJ in my portfolio?

RYOCX and QQQJ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RYOCX or QQQJ?

RYOCX has higher volatility (8.49%) compared to QQQJ (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYOCX dropped -83.75% vs QQQJ's -39.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.