PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYNVX vs. UOPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYNVX vs. UOPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX) and ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYNVX achieves a 16.00% return, which is significantly lower than UOPIX's 42.41% return. Over the past 10 years, RYNVX has underperformed UOPIX with an annualized return of 19.11%, while UOPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 34.63% annualized return.


RYNVX

1D
0.19%
1M
8.56%
YTD
16.00%
6M
15.59%
1Y
40.33%
3Y*
29.53%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*
19.11%

UOPIX

1D
0.94%
1M
22.21%
YTD
42.41%
6M
38.29%
1Y
86.40%
3Y*
49.52%
5Y*
25.25%
10Y*
34.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYNVX vs. UOPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYNVX
Rydex Nova Fund
16.00%21.42%33.14%35.31%-29.96%42.56%19.64%45.58%-10.24%31.17%
UOPIX
ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund
42.41%30.26%41.75%115.97%-60.70%48.28%86.57%80.53%-9.41%68.58%

Correlation

The correlation between RYNVX and UOPIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 1997

0.86

The correlation between RYNVX and UOPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYNVX vs. UOPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYNVX
RYNVX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RYNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
RYNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

UOPIX
UOPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UOPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UOPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
UOPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
UOPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
UOPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYNVX vs. UOPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX) and ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYNVXUOPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.60

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

12.66

+0.86

RYNVX vs. UOPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYNVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the UOPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYNVX and UOPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYNVXUOPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.80

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.56

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.79

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.12

+0.29

Drawdowns

RYNVX vs. UOPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYNVX drawdown since its inception was -76.54%, smaller than the maximum UOPIX drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYNVX and UOPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYNVXUOPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.54%

-99.80%

+23.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.84%

-24.97%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.49%

-42.52%

+15.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.92%

-65.01%

+24.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.58%

-65.01%

+16.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-43.02%

+43.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.62%

-84.82%

+65.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

7.08%

-4.00%

Volatility

RYNVX vs. UOPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX) is 4.26%, while ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX) has a volatility of 8.96%. This indicates that RYNVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UOPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYNVXUOPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

8.96%

-4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.46%

24.35%

-10.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.79%

32.12%

-14.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.95%

45.11%

-19.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.39%

44.17%

-16.78%

RYNVX vs. UOPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYNVX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is lower than UOPIX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYNVX vs. UOPIX - Dividend Comparison

RYNVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than UOPIX's 12.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYNVX
Rydex Nova Fund
0.65%0.76%0.66%0.59%22.11%9.07%0.53%0.00%0.00%1.97%1.22%0.13%
UOPIX
ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund
12.83%18.27%0.41%0.00%5.64%11.03%9.78%5.78%6.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, RYNVX and UOPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UOPIX has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to RYNVX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYNVX dropped -76.54% vs UOPIX's -99.80%.

UOPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYNVX and UOPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer