PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYMTX vs. GIUSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYMTX vs. GIUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX) and Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYMTX achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly higher than GIUSX's 0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, RYMTX has outperformed GIUSX with an annualized return of 3.72%, while GIUSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.67% annualized return.


RYMTX

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
8.95%
6M
9.75%
1Y
20.00%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
3.72%

GIUSX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.57%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.57%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
2.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYMTX vs. GIUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYMTX
Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund
8.95%5.52%0.56%3.62%14.75%2.62%2.07%7.18%-7.87%7.39%
GIUSX
Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class
0.59%7.86%2.91%7.07%-16.63%-0.90%14.63%4.47%1.20%6.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RYMTX and GIUSX is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

-0.09

The correlation between RYMTX and GIUSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.28 (5 years) to 0.00 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYMTX vs. GIUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYMTX
RYMTX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RYMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

GIUSX
GIUSX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GIUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GIUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GIUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GIUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GIUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYMTX vs. GIUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX) and Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYMTXGIUSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.27

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

2.01

+1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.88

6.18

+7.69

RYMTX vs. GIUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYMTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the GIUSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYMTX and GIUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYMTXGIUSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

1.48

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.04

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.56

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.71

-0.61

Drawdowns

RYMTX vs. GIUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYMTX drawdown since its inception was -34.19%, which is greater than GIUSX's maximum drawdown of -22.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYMTX and GIUSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYMTXGIUSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.19%

-22.02%

-12.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.43%

-2.99%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

-6.10%

-11.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.54%

-22.02%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.54%

-22.02%

+4.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-1.63%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-4.09%

-14.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

0.97%

+0.45%

Volatility

RYMTX vs. GIUSX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYMTX) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class (GIUSX) at 1.50%. This indicates that RYMTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYMTXGIUSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

1.50%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.46%

2.97%

+5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.10%

4.07%

+7.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.15%

5.91%

+6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.65%

4.83%

+5.82%

RYMTX vs. GIUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYMTX has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GIUSX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYMTX vs. GIUSX - Dividend Comparison

RYMTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, more than GIUSX's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GIUSX
Guggenheim Core Bond Fund Institutional Class
4.79%4.75%4.68%4.39%2.71%3.36%4.36%2.42%2.76%3.47%3.85%4.96%
RYMTX
Guggenheim Managed Futures Strategy Fund
5.53%6.03%5.10%1.02%4.80%0.00%7.56%0.00%0.00%4.70%5.19%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYMTX and GIUSX have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYMTX has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to GIUSX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYMTX dropped -34.19% vs GIUSX's -22.02%.

RYMTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYMTX and GIUSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer