PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYMQX vs. GOF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYMQX vs. GOF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund (RYMQX) and Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYMQX achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly higher than GOF's -9.55% return. Over the past 10 years, RYMQX has underperformed GOF with an annualized return of 2.17%, while GOF has yielded a comparatively higher 7.85% annualized return.


RYMQX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
4.86%
6M
4.22%
1Y
8.80%
3Y*
1.48%
5Y*
0.48%
10Y*
2.17%

GOF

1D
1.05%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
-9.55%
6M
-6.87%
1Y
-14.62%
3Y*
2.60%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYMQX vs. GOF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYMQX
Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund
4.86%1.58%-3.59%4.26%-3.47%7.17%7.40%4.79%-4.66%3.49%
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
-9.55%-1.92%38.04%-3.04%-5.78%4.90%21.51%10.51%-5.95%22.01%

Correlation

The correlation between RYMQX and GOF is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYMQX vs. GOF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYMQX
RYMQX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RYMQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

GOF
GOF Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
GOF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOF Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOF Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
GOF Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOF Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYMQX vs. GOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund (RYMQX) and Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYMQXGOFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

0.85

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

-0.63

+4.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.55

-1.13

+14.68

RYMQX vs. GOF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYMQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the GOF Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYMQX and GOF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYMQX vs. GOF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYMQX drawdown since its inception was -29.13%, smaller than the maximum GOF drawdown of -54.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYMQX and GOF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYMQXGOFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.13%

-54.66%

+25.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.22%

-23.24%

+21.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.98%

-28.56%

+14.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.98%

-32.41%

+18.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.98%

-38.50%

+24.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-19.43%

+16.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.87%

-7.09%

-1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

12.97%

-12.32%

Volatility

RYMQX vs. GOF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund (RYMQX) is 0.88%, while Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that RYMQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYMQXGOFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

3.57%

-2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.31%

11.15%

-7.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.13%

18.08%

-13.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.64%

18.20%

-12.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.29%

19.53%

-14.24%

RYMQX vs. GOF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYMQX has a 1.76% expense ratio, which is lower than GOF's 1.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYMQX vs. GOF - Dividend Comparison

RYMQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%, less than GOF's 20.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOF
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
20.60%16.97%14.32%17.07%14.36%11.93%11.26%12.08%11.96%10.13%11.13%12.98%
RYMQX
Guggenheim Series Multi-Hedge Strategies Fund
9.66%10.13%2.89%3.12%1.67%0.78%1.03%2.10%0.16%0.00%0.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYMQX and GOF have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOF has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to RYMQX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYMQX dropped -29.13% vs GOF's -54.66%.

RYMQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYMQX and GOF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer