RYMMX vs. DHSCX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

RYMMX (Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund) and DHSCX (Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RYMMX returned 9.83%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for DHSCX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RYMMX charges 2.26%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for DHSCX.

Performance

RYMMX vs. DHSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund (RYMMX) and Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYMMX achieves a 17.49% return, which is significantly lower than DHSCX's 27.91% return. Over the past 10 years, RYMMX has underperformed DHSCX with an annualized return of 9.83%, while DHSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.63% annualized return.

RYMMX

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 5.59%
• 6M: 12.45%
• YTD: 17.49%
• 1Y: 25.59%
• 3Y*: 10.78%
• 5Y*: 9.75%
• 10Y*: 9.83%
• ALL TIME*: 7.16%

DHSCX

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -0.26%
• 6M: 19.95%
• YTD: 27.91%
• 1Y: 42.53%
• 3Y*: 19.29%
• 5Y*: 13.45%
• 10Y*: 10.63%
• ALL TIME*: 10.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DHSCX Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RYMMX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

RYMMX vs. DHSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RYMMX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund	17.49%	5.11%	3.49%	26.78%	-6.06%	30.05%	5.74%	20.83%	-19.66%	12.28%
DHSCX Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund	27.91%	11.48%	12.75%	23.99%	-15.11%	32.30%	-0.54%	21.45%	-15.23%	10.56%

Correlation

The correlation between RYMMX and DHSCX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005	0.91

The correlation between RYMMX and DHSCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.91 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RYMMX vs. DHSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYMMX

RYMMX Risk / Return Rank: 36
RYMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
RYMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
RYMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
RYMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
RYMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

DHSCX

DHSCX Risk / Return Rank: 83
DHSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
DHSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DHSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
DHSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DHSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYMMX vs. DHSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund (RYMMX) and Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RYMMX	DHSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	1.92	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.84	2.85	-1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.33	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	3.47	-1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.02	11.34	-6.32

RYMMX vs. DHSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYMMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the DHSCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYMMX and DHSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RYMMX vs. DHSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYMMX drawdown since its inception was -73.49%, which is greater than DHSCX's maximum drawdown of -53.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYMMX and DHSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYMMX	DHSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.49%	-53.15%	-20.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.54%	-11.02%	-1.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.11%	-28.41%	+3.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.11%	-28.41%	+3.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.43%	-46.19%	-8.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.40%	+1.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.90%	-8.27%	-3.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.09%	3.38%	+0.71%

Volatility

RYMMX vs. DHSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund (RYMMX) is 3.11%, while Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that RYMMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYMMX	DHSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.11%	5.78%	-2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.17%	14.11%	-2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.21%	19.87%	-2.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.65%	21.49%	+0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.86%	22.24%	+2.62%

RYMMX vs. DHSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYMMX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than DHSCX's 1.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

RYMMX vs. DHSCX - Dividend Comparison

RYMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than DHSCX's 4.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DHSCX Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund	4.54%	5.80%	16.10%	30.73%	18.17%	17.43%	0.32%	6.94%	10.29%	6.68%	2.50%	1.63%
RYMMX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Fund	0.16%	0.18%	8.21%	0.48%	17.90%	6.82%	0.05%	0.00%	3.84%	1.94%	0.22%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYMMX and DHSCX in my portfolio?

RYMMX and DHSCX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RYMMX or DHSCX?

DHSCX has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to RYMMX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYMMX dropped -73.49% vs DHSCX's -53.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DHSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.