PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYMKX vs. UOPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYMKX vs. UOPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund (RYMKX) and ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYMKX achieves a 26.23% return, which is significantly lower than UOPIX's 42.41% return. Over the past 10 years, RYMKX has underperformed UOPIX with an annualized return of 11.33%, while UOPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 34.63% annualized return.


RYMKX

1D
1.35%
1M
7.01%
YTD
26.23%
6M
23.72%
1Y
58.74%
3Y*
21.87%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
11.33%

UOPIX

1D
0.94%
1M
22.21%
YTD
42.41%
6M
38.29%
1Y
86.40%
3Y*
49.52%
5Y*
25.25%
10Y*
34.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYMKX vs. UOPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYMKX
Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund
26.23%12.79%11.00%20.06%-33.16%16.62%20.94%35.38%-19.62%20.07%
UOPIX
ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund
42.41%30.26%41.75%115.97%-60.70%48.28%86.57%80.53%-9.41%68.58%

Correlation

The correlation between RYMKX and UOPIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.77

The correlation between RYMKX and UOPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYMKX vs. UOPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYMKX
RYMKX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
RYMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

UOPIX
UOPIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UOPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UOPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
UOPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
UOPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
UOPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYMKX vs. UOPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund (RYMKX) and ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYMKXUOPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.42

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

3.60

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.82

12.66

+0.16

RYMKX vs. UOPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYMKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the UOPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYMKX and UOPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYMKXUOPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.80

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.56

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.79

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.12

+0.09

Drawdowns

RYMKX vs. UOPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYMKX drawdown since its inception was -77.57%, smaller than the maximum UOPIX drawdown of -99.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYMKX and UOPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYMKXUOPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.57%

-99.80%

+22.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.96%

-24.97%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.72%

-42.52%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.65%

-65.01%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.65%

-65.01%

+1.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.20%

-43.02%

+21.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.36%

-84.82%

+61.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.89%

7.08%

-2.19%

Volatility

RYMKX vs. UOPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund (RYMKX) is 8.38%, while ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund (UOPIX) has a volatility of 8.96%. This indicates that RYMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UOPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYMKXUOPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.38%

8.96%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.33%

24.35%

-4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.67%

32.12%

-3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.43%

45.11%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.17%

44.17%

-3.00%

RYMKX vs. UOPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYMKX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than UOPIX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYMKX vs. UOPIX - Dividend Comparison

RYMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than UOPIX's 12.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYMKX
Rydex Russell 2000 1.5x Strategy Fund
0.66%0.84%1.30%0.21%0.00%57.14%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%9.87%8.26%
UOPIX
ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Fund
12.83%18.27%0.41%0.00%5.64%11.03%9.78%5.78%6.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYMKX and UOPIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UOPIX has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to RYMKX (8.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYMKX dropped -77.57% vs UOPIX's -99.80%.

UOPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYMKX and UOPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer