PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYMDX vs. RYTPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYMDX vs. RYTPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy Fund (RYMDX) and Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYMDX achieves a 20.50% return, which is significantly higher than RYTPX's -16.84% return. Over the past 10 years, RYMDX has outperformed RYTPX with an annualized return of 11.52%, while RYTPX has yielded a comparatively lower -16.96% annualized return.


RYMDX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.82%
6M
12.32%
YTD
20.50%
1Y
26.46%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
11.52%

RYTPX

1D
-0.79%
1M
-3.45%
6M
-13.79%
YTD
-16.84%
1Y
-28.50%
3Y*
-27.35%
5Y*
-21.23%
10Y*
-16.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYMDX vs. RYTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYMDX
Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy Fund
20.50%5.29%15.46%19.11%-23.31%34.58%9.87%36.13%-19.37%22.67%
RYTPX
Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund
-16.84%-27.24%-29.24%-31.96%29.31%-43.38%-50.05%-41.84%4.42%-32.54%

Correlation

The correlation between RYMDX and RYTPX is -0.75, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2002

-0.86

The correlation between RYMDX and RYTPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.86 (all time) to -0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYMDX vs. RYTPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYMDX
RYMDX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
RYMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

RYTPX
RYTPX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
RYTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
RYTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYMDX vs. RYTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy Fund (RYMDX) and Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYMDXRYTPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.82

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

-0.94

+2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.49

-1.66

+8.15

RYMDX vs. RYTPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the RYTPX Sharpe Ratio of -1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYMDX and RYTPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYMDX vs. RYTPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYMDX drawdown since its inception was -75.43%, smaller than the maximum RYTPX drawdown of -99.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYMDX and RYTPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYMDXRYTPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.43%

-99.92%

+24.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.50%

-29.99%

+16.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.20%

-68.03%

+32.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.77%

-75.66%

+32.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.09%

-96.13%

+38.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.00%

-99.92%

+96.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.38%

-82.36%

+66.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

16.84%

-12.99%

Volatility

RYMDX vs. RYTPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy Fund (RYMDX) is 6.89%, while Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund (RYTPX) has a volatility of 8.58%. This indicates that RYMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYMDXRYTPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.89%

8.58%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.54%

19.92%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.75%

25.02%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.49%

33.94%

-2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.52%

257.87%

-225.35%

RYMDX vs. RYTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYMDX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is lower than RYTPX's 2.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYMDX vs. RYTPX - Dividend Comparison

RYMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than RYTPX's 6.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYMDX
Rydex Mid-Cap 1.5x Strategy Fund
0.61%0.73%0.72%0.35%0.00%17.47%0.38%0.18%0.56%0.53%0.19%0.67%
RYTPX
Rydex Inverse S&P 500 2x Strategy Fund
6.19%5.15%6.90%3.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYMDX and RYTPX have a correlation of -0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYTPX has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to RYMDX (6.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYMDX dropped -75.43% vs RYTPX's -99.92%.

RYMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYMDX and RYTPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer