PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYDAX vs. BUFBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYDAX vs. BUFBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average Fund (RYDAX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYDAX achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly lower than BUFBX's 12.83% return. Over the past 10 years, RYDAX has outperformed BUFBX with an annualized return of 11.59%, while BUFBX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.00% annualized return.


RYDAX

1D
0.47%
1M
4.95%
YTD
6.79%
6M
7.15%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
15.15%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
11.59%

BUFBX

1D
0.57%
1M
3.64%
YTD
12.83%
6M
12.77%
1Y
19.88%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
11.23%
10Y*
10.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYDAX vs. BUFBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYDAX
Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average Fund
6.79%12.98%13.10%14.36%-8.88%19.11%7.47%23.13%-5.14%26.19%
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
12.83%10.37%10.26%7.42%3.97%29.97%-2.27%18.76%-7.01%13.20%

Correlation

The correlation between RYDAX and BUFBX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between RYDAX and BUFBX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYDAX vs. BUFBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYDAX
RYDAX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
RYDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
RYDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFBX
BUFBX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BUFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYDAX vs. BUFBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average Fund (RYDAX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYDAXBUFBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

7.18

-5.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.21

17.54

-9.33

RYDAX vs. BUFBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYDAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the BUFBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYDAX and BUFBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYDAXBUFBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

2.28

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.84

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.64

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.59

+0.07

Drawdowns

RYDAX vs. BUFBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYDAX drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, smaller than the maximum BUFBX drawdown of -39.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYDAX and BUFBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYDAXBUFBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.34%

-39.78%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.86%

-2.83%

-7.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.50%

-12.85%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-14.67%

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.34%

-35.51%

-1.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.22%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-4.72%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

1.16%

+1.44%

Volatility

RYDAX vs. BUFBX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average Fund (RYDAX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) have volatilities of 2.99% and 3.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYDAXBUFBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.06%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.27%

6.61%

+2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

8.93%

+3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

13.40%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.61%

15.60%

+2.01%

RYDAX vs. BUFBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYDAX has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFBX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYDAX vs. BUFBX - Dividend Comparison

RYDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than BUFBX's 7.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
7.99%9.10%3.77%3.48%4.16%5.57%3.33%2.73%6.01%5.49%2.39%3.67%
RYDAX
Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average Fund
0.35%0.38%1.73%0.75%3.17%1.22%4.87%4.02%1.25%3.70%0.56%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYDAX and BUFBX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUFBX has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to RYDAX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYDAX dropped -37.34% vs BUFBX's -39.78%.

BUFBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYDAX and BUFBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer