RYCLX vs. SHPIX
RYCLX (Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund) and SHPIX (ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RYCLX returned -11.50%/yr vs 8.91%/yr for SHPIX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYCLX charges 2.39%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for SHPIX.
Performance
RYCLX vs. SHPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYCLX achieves a -12.26% return, which is significantly higher than SHPIX's -16.70% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCLX has underperformed SHPIX with an annualized return of -11.50%, while SHPIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.91% annualized return.
RYCLX
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- -12.26%
- 6M
- -10.54%
- 1Y
- -14.39%
- 3Y*
- -8.62%
- 5Y*
- -5.65%
- 10Y*
- -11.50%
SHPIX
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- YTD
- -16.70%
- 6M
- -14.43%
- 1Y
- -26.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.98%
- 5Y*
- 48.24%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
RYCLX vs. SHPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCLX Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund | -12.26% | -1.04% | -5.59% | -8.75% | 8.93% | -24.21% | -25.53% | -21.03% | 11.39% | -14.94% |
SHPIX ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund | -16.70% | -9.61% | 83.27% | 344.97% | 16.39% | -19.78% | -31.60% | -20.89% | 9.96% | -14.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYCLX and SHPIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005 | 0.95 |
The correlation between RYCLX and SHPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYCLX vs. SHPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RYCLX
SHPIX
RYCLX vs. SHPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund (RYCLX) and ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund (SHPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RYCLX | SHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.78 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.98 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.70 | -1.74 | +0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RYCLX vs. SHPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYCLX drawdown since its inception was -95.61%, roughly equal to the maximum SHPIX drawdown of -96.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCLX and SHPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYCLX | SHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.61% | -96.86% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.57% | -28.36% | +10.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.65% | -41.16% | +9.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.22% | -41.16% | +6.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.64% | -70.45% | -1.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.56% | -75.84% | -19.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.24% | -74.99% | +4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.95% | 16.08% | -7.13% |
Volatility
RYCLX vs. SHPIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund (RYCLX) is 4.76%, while ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund (SHPIX) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that RYCLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYCLX | SHPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 6.44% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.79% | 14.36% | -2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 19.69% | -3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 189.02% | -168.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.45% | 134.68% | -113.23% |
RYCLX vs. SHPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYCLX has a 2.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SHPIX's 1.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYCLX vs. SHPIX - Dividend Comparison
RYCLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.62%, more than SHPIX's 33.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCLX Rydex Inverse Mid-Cap Strategy Fund | 37.62% | 33.01% | 25.75% | 9.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.76% | 0.89% |
SHPIX ProFunds Short Small Cap ProFund | 33.23% | 5.70% | 0.00% | 17.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, RYCLX and SHPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SHPIX has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to RYCLX (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCLX dropped -95.61% vs SHPIX's -96.86%.
RYCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.96 vs -1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYCLX and SHPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer