RYCKX vs. RYVNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) and Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RYVNX).
RYCKX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on Feb 20, 2004. RYVNX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on May 22, 2000.
Performance
RYCKX vs. RYVNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RYCKX vs. RYVNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCKX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund | 0.34% | 6.61% | 15.10% | 13.97% | -23.05% | 11.26% | 29.72% | 14.60% | -15.17% | 18.02% |
RYVNX Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund | 21.11% | -35.24% | -34.30% | -57.09% | 65.14% | -45.41% | -69.71% | -50.05% | -9.71% | -44.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYCKX achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than RYVNX's 21.11% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCKX has outperformed RYVNX with an annualized return of 6.45%, while RYVNX has yielded a comparatively lower -35.53% annualized return.
RYCKX
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -9.85%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 18.58%
- 3Y*
- 11.21%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 6.45%
RYVNX
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- 17.79%
- YTD
- 21.11%
- 6M
- 15.51%
- 1Y
- -33.38%
- 3Y*
- -31.18%
- 5Y*
- -26.34%
- 10Y*
- -35.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RYCKX vs. RYVNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYCKX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is lower than RYVNX's 2.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RYCKX vs. RYVNX — Risk / Return Rank
RYCKX
RYVNX
RYCKX vs. RYVNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) and Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RYVNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYCKX | RYVNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | -0.74 | +1.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | -0.89 | +2.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.87 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | -0.51 | +1.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | -0.60 | +5.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYCKX | RYVNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | -0.74 | +1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | -0.59 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | -0.79 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | -0.60 | +0.91 |
Correlation
The correlation between RYCKX and RYVNX is -0.80. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
RYCKX vs. RYVNX - Dividend Comparison
RYCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYVNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.77%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCKX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.92% | 0.00% | 14.34% | 13.66% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 18.93% | 7.60% | 1.72% | 5.90% |
RYVNX Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund | 8.77% | 10.62% | 6.03% | 4.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RYCKX vs. RYVNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYCKX drawdown since its inception was -52.60%, smaller than the maximum RYVNX drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCKX and RYVNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYCKX | RYVNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.60% | -100.00% | +47.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.33% | -58.82% | +45.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.98% | -84.44% | +48.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.75% | -99.16% | +54.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.50% | -99.99% | +89.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -89.49% | +79.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 49.21% | -46.10% |
Volatility
RYCKX vs. RYVNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) is 7.64%, while Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy Fund (RYVNX) has a volatility of 10.66%. This indicates that RYCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYVNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RYCKX | RYVNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.64% | 10.66% | -3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.60% | 24.61% | -11.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.74% | 45.06% | -22.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.65% | 45.09% | -22.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.96% | 44.94% | -21.98% |