RYCKX vs. CTIGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX).
RYCKX is managed by Rydex Funds. It was launched on Feb 20, 2004. CTIGX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Jul 31, 2019.
Performance
RYCKX vs. CTIGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RYCKX vs. CTIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCKX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund | 0.34% | 6.61% | 15.10% | 13.97% | -23.05% | 11.26% | 29.72% | 3.78% |
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | -5.11% | 21.21% | 44.09% | 12.26% | -34.88% | 7.64% | 58.94% | -3.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYCKX achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly higher than CTIGX's -5.11% return.
RYCKX
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -9.85%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 18.58%
- 3Y*
- 11.21%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 6.45%
CTIGX
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- -5.11%
- 6M
- -0.49%
- 1Y
- 31.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RYCKX vs. CTIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYCKX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than CTIGX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RYCKX vs. CTIGX — Risk / Return Rank
RYCKX
CTIGX
RYCKX vs. CTIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYCKX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 1.17 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 1.68 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 2.60 | -1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 9.43 | -4.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYCKX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 1.17 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.16 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.38 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between RYCKX and CTIGX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RYCKX vs. CTIGX - Dividend Comparison
RYCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCKX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.92% | 0.00% | 14.34% | 13.66% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 18.93% | 7.60% | 1.72% | 5.90% |
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | 4.84% | 4.59% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RYCKX vs. CTIGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYCKX drawdown since its inception was -52.60%, which is greater than CTIGX's maximum drawdown of -46.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCKX and CTIGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYCKX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.60% | -46.26% | -6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.33% | -11.56% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.98% | -46.26% | +10.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.50% | -11.56% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -19.06% | +9.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 3.19% | -0.08% |
Volatility
RYCKX vs. CTIGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) is 7.64%, while Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) has a volatility of 11.44%. This indicates that RYCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RYCKX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.64% | 11.44% | -3.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.60% | 20.05% | -6.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.74% | 28.24% | -5.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.65% | 26.74% | -4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.96% | 29.03% | -6.07% |