RYCKX vs. BQMGX
RYCKX (Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund) and BQMGX (Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RYCKX returned 8.92%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for BQMGX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYCKX charges 2.26%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for BQMGX.
Performance
RYCKX vs. BQMGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYCKX achieves a 21.97% return, which is significantly higher than BQMGX's -2.93% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RYCKX having a 8.92% annualized return and BQMGX not far ahead at 9.05%.
RYCKX
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 21.97%
- 6M
- 19.17%
- 1Y
- 33.08%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
BQMGX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- -2.93%
- 6M
- -4.11%
- 1Y
- -2.85%
- 3Y*
- 5.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
RYCKX vs. BQMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCKX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund | 21.97% | 6.61% | 15.10% | 13.97% | -23.05% | 11.26% | 29.72% | 14.60% | -15.17% | 18.02% |
BQMGX Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund | -2.93% | -0.29% | 14.16% | 13.00% | -19.44% | 23.02% | 19.62% | 32.05% | -6.68% | 22.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYCKX and BQMGX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2010 | 0.88 |
Over the past year, the correlation between RYCKX and BQMGX has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYCKX vs. BQMGX — Risk / Return Rank
RYCKX
BQMGX
RYCKX vs. BQMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) and Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RYCKX | BQMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.99 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | -0.15 | +3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | -0.33 | +12.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RYCKX vs. BQMGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYCKX drawdown since its inception was -52.60%, which is greater than BQMGX's maximum drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCKX and BQMGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYCKX | BQMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.60% | -36.05% | -16.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.50% | -11.62% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.14% | -18.72% | -8.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.98% | -25.92% | -10.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.75% | -36.05% | -8.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.84% | +8.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.49% | -5.88% | -3.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 5.19% | -2.57% |
Volatility
RYCKX vs. BQMGX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund (RYCKX) has a higher volatility of 6.34% compared to Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund (BQMGX) at 3.35%. This indicates that RYCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BQMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYCKX | BQMGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.34% | 3.35% | +2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.39% | 9.31% | +6.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.04% | 12.30% | +6.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.87% | 16.85% | +6.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 17.99% | +5.13% |
RYCKX vs. BQMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYCKX has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is higher than BQMGX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYCKX vs. BQMGX - Dividend Comparison
RYCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BQMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BQMGX Bright Rock Mid Cap Growth Fund | 4.24% | 4.12% | 5.99% | 0.00% | 5.90% | 8.05% | 5.27% | 3.50% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.07% | 5.80% |
RYCKX Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.92% | 0.00% | 14.34% | 13.66% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 18.93% | 7.60% | 1.72% | 5.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RYCKX and BQMGX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYCKX has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to BQMGX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCKX dropped -52.60% vs BQMGX's -36.05%.
RYCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYCKX and BQMGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer