PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RY vs. TF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RY vs. TF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royal Bank of Canada (RY) and Timbercreek Financial Corp. (TF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RY is traded in USD, while TF.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the TF.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RY achieves a 18.68% return, which is significantly higher than TF.TO's -1.47% return.


RY

1D
0.14%
1M
8.80%
YTD
18.68%
6M
21.99%
1Y
60.93%
3Y*
33.55%
5Y*
18.33%
10Y*
17.18%

TF.TO

1D
1.04%
1M
1.86%
YTD
-1.47%
6M
0.39%
1Y
-5.08%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
-1.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RY vs. TF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RY
Royal Bank of Canada
18.68%46.29%23.80%12.72%-8.00%34.11%8.42%20.17%-12.88%24.95%
TF.TO
Timbercreek Financial Corp.
-1.47%11.68%7.02%5.71%-24.41%19.65%-3.15%27.25%-9.56%27.32%

Correlation

The correlation between RY and TF.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2016

0.31

The correlation between RY and TF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RY:

$205.02B

TF.TO:

CA$545.34M

EPS

RY:

CA$18.17

TF.TO:

CA$0.36

PE Ratio

RY:

15.35

TF.TO:

18.15

PEG Ratio

RY:

2.22

TF.TO:

0.84

PS Ratio

RY:

2.45

TF.TO:

3.74

PB Ratio

RY:

2.21

TF.TO:

0.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

RY:

CA$138.99B

TF.TO:

CA$145.73M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RY:

CA$65.64B

TF.TO:

CA$79.48M

EBITDA (TTM)

RY:

CA$30.01B

TF.TO:

CA$55.87M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RY vs. TF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RY
RY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
RY Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

TF.TO
TF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
TF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RY vs. TF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Bank of Canada (RY) and Timbercreek Financial Corp. (TF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYTF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+6.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

0.95

+0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.97

-0.30

+6.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.22

-0.70

+22.91

RY vs. TF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RY Sharpe Ratio is 3.97, which is higher than the TF.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RY and TF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RY vs. TF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RY drawdown since its inception was -62.90%, which is greater than TF.TO's maximum drawdown of -45.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RY and TF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYTF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.90%

-45.42%

-17.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.04%

-18.58%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.88%

-26.64%

+6.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.36%

-37.57%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.10%

+10.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-9.16%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

7.89%

-5.20%

Volatility

RY vs. TF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Royal Bank of Canada (RY) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Timbercreek Financial Corp. (TF.TO) at 3.57%. This indicates that RY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYTF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

3.57%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.34%

12.09%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.10%

16.24%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.00%

19.52%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.76%

20.43%

-0.67%

Dividends

RY vs. TF.TO - Dividend Comparison

RY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than TF.TO's 10.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RY
Royal Bank of Canada
2.32%2.54%3.39%4.29%4.07%3.24%3.88%3.88%4.27%3.22%3.95%5.41%
TF.TO
Timbercreek Financial Corp.
10.47%10.09%9.76%10.35%9.76%7.18%7.99%6.95%7.89%7.12%3.92%0.00%

Financials

RY vs. TF.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royal Bank of Canada and Timbercreek Financial Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
33.93B
39.10M
(RY) Total Revenue
(TF.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

RY vs. TF.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Royal Bank of Canada and Timbercreek Financial Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
48.7%
56.4%
Portfolio components
RY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported a gross profit of 16.51B and revenue of 33.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.7%.

TF.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Timbercreek Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 22.05M and revenue of 39.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.4%.

RY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported an operating income of 7.10B and revenue of 33.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

TF.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Timbercreek Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 17.68M and revenue of 39.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.2%.

RY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported a net income of 5.51B and revenue of 33.93B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.

TF.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Timbercreek Financial Corp. reported a net income of 10.37M and revenue of 39.10M, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RY and TF.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RY and TF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer