RY vs. RSI.TO
RY (Royal Bank of Canada) and RSI.TO (Rogers Sugar Inc.) are both stocks. RY operates in Banks - Diversified (Financial Services), while RSI.TO operates in Confectioners (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, RY returned 17.18%/yr vs 7.41%/yr for RSI.TO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RY vs. RSI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RY is traded in USD, while RSI.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the RSI.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RY achieves a 18.68% return, which is significantly higher than RSI.TO's 15.60% return. Over the past 10 years, RY has outperformed RSI.TO with an annualized return of 17.18%, while RSI.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.41% annualized return.
RY
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 18.68%
- 6M
- 21.99%
- 1Y
- 59.59%
- 3Y*
- 33.55%
- 5Y*
- 18.33%
- 10Y*
- 17.18%
RSI.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 15.60%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 27.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.41%
RY vs. RSI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RY Royal Bank of Canada | 18.68% | 46.29% | 23.80% | 12.72% | -8.00% | 34.11% | 8.42% | 20.17% | -12.88% | 24.95% |
RSI.TO Rogers Sugar Inc. | 15.60% | 12.97% | 7.15% | 3.16% | -4.55% | 12.95% | 25.73% | 0.64% | -15.38% | 5.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between RY and RSI.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2006 | 0.25 |
The correlation between RY and RSI.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RY:
$205.02B
RSI.TO:
CA$1.04B
RY:
CA$18.17
RSI.TO:
CA$0.47
RY:
15.35
RSI.TO:
14.64
RY:
2.22
RSI.TO:
1.33
RY:
2.45
RSI.TO:
0.82
RY:
2.21
RSI.TO:
2.19
RY:
CA$138.99B
RSI.TO:
CA$1.24B
RY:
CA$65.64B
RSI.TO:
CA$199.73M
RY:
CA$30.01B
RSI.TO:
CA$150.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RY vs. RSI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RY
RSI.TO
RY vs. RSI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Bank of Canada (RY) and Rogers Sugar Inc. (RSI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RY | RSI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.35 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.97 | 3.23 | +2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.22 | 9.77 | +12.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RY vs. RSI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RY drawdown since its inception was -62.90%, which is greater than RSI.TO's maximum drawdown of -56.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RY and RSI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RY | RSI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.90% | -56.20% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.04% | -8.65% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.88% | -17.06% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.36% | -22.07% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.95% | -42.58% | +2.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.32% | -12.73% | +3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 2.85% | -0.16% |
Volatility
RY vs. RSI.TO - Volatility Comparison
Royal Bank of Canada (RY) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Rogers Sugar Inc. (RSI.TO) at 3.10%. This indicates that RY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RY | RSI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 3.10% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.34% | 9.76% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.10% | 15.05% | +0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.00% | 17.36% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 20.03% | -0.27% |
Dividends
RY vs. RSI.TO - Dividend Comparison
RY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than RSI.TO's 5.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSI.TO Rogers Sugar Inc. | 5.19% | 6.05% | 6.13% | 6.69% | 6.33% | 6.05% | 6.42% | 7.32% | 6.62% | 5.70% | 5.29% | 8.49% |
RY Royal Bank of Canada | 2.32% | 2.54% | 3.39% | 4.29% | 4.07% | 3.24% | 3.88% | 3.88% | 4.27% | 3.22% | 3.95% | 5.41% |
Financials
RY vs. RSI.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royal Bank of Canada and Rogers Sugar Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RY vs. RSI.TO - Profitability Comparison
RY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported a gross profit of 16.51B and revenue of 33.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.7%.
RSI.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Sugar Inc. reported a gross profit of 48.72M and revenue of 280.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.
RY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported an operating income of 7.10B and revenue of 33.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.
RSI.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Sugar Inc. reported an operating income of 27.98M and revenue of 280.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
RY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported a net income of 5.51B and revenue of 33.93B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.
RSI.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Sugar Inc. reported a net income of 12.65M and revenue of 280.62M, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RY and RSI.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RY and RSI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer