RXO vs. CGDV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RXO (RXO Inc.) is a stock, while CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Over the past 3 years, RXO returned 7.00%/yr vs 25.37%/yr for CGDV. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RXO vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RXO Inc. (RXO) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RXO achieves a 113.21% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's 12.51% return.

RXO

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 37.57%
• YTD: 113.21%
• 6M: 100.22%
• 1Y: 77.30%
• 3Y*: 7.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGDV

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 5.15%
• YTD: 12.51%
• 6M: 13.53%
• 1Y: 32.83%
• 3Y*: 25.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RXO vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RXO RXO Inc.	113.21%	-46.98%	2.49%	35.23%	-18.10%
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	12.51%	25.50%	20.10%	28.81%	6.56%

Correlation

The correlation between RXO and CGDV is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2022	0.43

Return for Risk

RXO vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RXO

RXO Risk / Return Rank: 70
RXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
RXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
RXO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
RXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
RXO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

CGDV

CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 82
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RXO vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RXO Inc. (RXO) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RXO	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	2.85	-1.77
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	3.89	-2.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.53	-0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	3.46	-1.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.23	16.41	-12.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RXO vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RXO Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RXO and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RXO	CGDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	2.85	-1.77
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	1.25	-1.12

Drawdowns

RXO vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RXO drawdown since its inception was -67.15%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXO and CGDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RXO	CGDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.15%	-21.82%	-45.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.07%	-9.75%	-33.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.15%	-14.28%	-52.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.52%	0.00%	-15.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.13%	-3.62%	-22.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.37%	2.06%	+15.31%

Volatility

RXO vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

RXO Inc. (RXO) has a higher volatility of 31.69% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 3.07%. This indicates that RXO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RXO	CGDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	31.69%	3.07%	+28.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.92%	9.17%	+44.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.17%	11.59%	+60.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.72%	15.49%	+41.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.72%	15.49%	+41.23%

Dividends

RXO vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

RXO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF	1.16%	1.29%	1.60%	1.65%	1.36%
RXO RXO Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RXO and CGDV in my portfolio?

RXO and CGDV have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RXO or CGDV?

RXO has higher volatility (31.69%) compared to CGDV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXO dropped -67.15% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.