RXD vs. BITO
RXD (ProShares UltraShort Health Care) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RXD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the DJ Global United States (All) / Health Care -IND (-200%), while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. RXD is passively managed, while BITO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RXD returned -10.24%/yr vs 21.20%/yr for BITO. Their -0.20 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
RXD vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RXD achieves a -10.24% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -29.42% return.
RXD
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- -10.79%
- YTD
- -10.24%
- 1Y
- -35.49%
- 3Y*
- -10.24%
- 5Y*
- -7.59%
- 10Y*
- -19.63%
- ALL TIME*
- -22.75%
BITO
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- 6M
- -26.02%
- YTD
- -29.42%
- 1Y
- -46.40%
- 3Y*
- 21.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.89B | $2.63B | $2.08B | |
| $208.34K | $158.30K | $97.64K |
RXD vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RXD ProShares UltraShort Health Care | -10.24% | -21.66% | 4.83% | 3.25% | 1.20% | -17.38% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -29.42% | -11.19% | 104.45% | 137.33% | -63.91% | -29.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXD and BITO is -0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021 | -0.20 |
The correlation between RXD and BITO shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (all time) to -0.04 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXD vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
RXD
BITO
RXD vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Health Care (RXD) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RXD | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.81 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | -0.89 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | -1.36 | -0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RXD vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXD drawdown since its inception was -99.68%, which is greater than BITO's maximum drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXD and BITO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXD | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.68% | -77.86% | -21.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.79% | -54.47% | +13.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.58% | -54.47% | +11.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.67% | -51.32% | -48.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.00% | -37.18% | -44.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.78% | 35.48% | -9.70% |
Volatility
RXD vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Health Care (RXD) has a higher volatility of 11.80% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 8.96%. This indicates that RXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXD | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.80% | 8.96% | +2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.09% | 33.45% | -9.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.60% | 44.19% | -12.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.35% | 54.60% | -24.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.15% | 54.60% | -21.45% |
RXD vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RXD and BITO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
RXD vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
RXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than BITO's 61.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 47.47% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RXD ProShares UltraShort Health Care | 3.31% | 3.29% | 4.36% | 3.17% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.73% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RXD and BITO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RXD has higher volatility (11.80%) compared to BITO (8.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RXD dropped -99.68% vs BITO's -77.86%.
On 3-year performance, BITO leads with 21.20% vs -10.24% for RXD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 8.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BITO has performed better with a 21.20% return vs -10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RXD and BITO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
BITO has the higher dividend yield at 47.47%, compared with 3.31% for RXD.
RXD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITO is Cryptocurrency.
BITO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.09 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RXD and BITO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer