RXD vs. BEG
RXD (ProShares UltraShort Health Care) and BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. RXD is passively managed, while BEG is actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RXD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BEG.
Performance
RXD vs. BEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RXD achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 658.88% return.
RXD
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 3.27%
- 6M
- 3.62%
- 1Y
- -24.38%
- 3Y*
- -6.35%
- 5Y*
- -6.92%
- 10Y*
- -19.74%
BEG
- 1D
- -13.66%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 658.88%
- 6M
- 577.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RXD vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RXD ProShares UltraShort Health Care | 3.27% | 1.22% |
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 658.88% | 1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between RXD and BEG is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RXD vs. BEG — Risk / Return Rank
RXD
BEG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RXD vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Health Care (RXD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RXD | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RXD vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RXD drawdown since its inception was -99.65%, which is greater than BEG's maximum drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RXD and BEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RXD | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.65% | -59.85% | -39.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.62% | -13.66% | -85.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.91% | -16.74% | -65.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.96% | — | — |
Volatility
RXD vs. BEG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RXD | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.71% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.25% | 212.91% | -182.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.88% | 212.91% | -183.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.01% | 212.91% | -179.90% |
RXD vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RXD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BEG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
RXD vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison
RXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while BEG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RXD ProShares UltraShort Health Care | 2.71% | 3.29% | 4.36% | 3.17% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 1.73% | 0.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RXD and BEG have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RXD.
RXD has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.00% for BEG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RXD and 0.75% for BEG.
Find the right allocation for RXD and BEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer