RWR vs. VPU
RWR (SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF) and VPU (Vanguard Utilities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWR is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, while VPU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWR returned 5.69%/yr vs 9.06%/yr for VPU. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RWR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VPU.
Performance
RWR vs. VPU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWR achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than VPU's 4.93% return. Over the past 10 years, RWR has underperformed VPU with an annualized return of 5.69%, while VPU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.06% annualized return.
RWR
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 16.67%
- 6M
- 16.81%
- 1Y
- 19.90%
- 3Y*
- 12.26%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- 5.69%
VPU
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 4.93%
- 6M
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- 11.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.06%
RWR vs. VPU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 16.67% | 3.20% | 7.74% | 13.76% | -26.09% | 45.47% | -11.40% | 22.71% | -4.47% | 3.47% |
VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF | 4.93% | 16.46% | 23.04% | -7.45% | 1.06% | 17.40% | -0.74% | 24.89% | 4.38% | 12.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWR and VPU is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.58 |
The correlation between RWR and VPU shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RWR vs. VPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RWR
VPU
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
-
Real Estate
RWR
VPU
-
Financial Services
RWR
VPU
-
Utilities
RWR
VPU
Basic Materials
RWR
-
VPU
-
Communication Services
RWR
-
VPU
-
Consumer Cyclical
RWR
-
VPU
-
Consumer Defensive
RWR
-
VPU
-
Energy
RWR
-
VPU
Healthcare
RWR
-
VPU
-
Industrials
RWR
-
VPU
Technology
RWR
-
VPU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWR vs. VPU — Risk / Return Rank
RWR
VPU
RWR vs. VPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RWR | VPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.15 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 1.34 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.47 | 2.91 | +5.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RWR vs. VPU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWR drawdown since its inception was -74.92%, which is greater than VPU's maximum drawdown of -46.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWR and VPU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWR | VPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.92% | -46.31% | -28.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.04% | -8.90% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.85% | -17.34% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.58% | -25.15% | -7.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.39% | -36.42% | -7.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.69% | +5.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.09% | -7.78% | -5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 4.10% | -1.74% |
Volatility
RWR vs. VPU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) is 4.93%, while Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that RWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWR | VPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 5.55% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 11.52% | -1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.72% | 14.41% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 17.07% | +1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.52% | 19.13% | +2.39% |
RWR vs. VPU - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VPU's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RWR vs. VPU - Dividend Comparison
RWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than VPU's 2.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF | 3.27% | 3.78% | 3.76% | 3.75% | 3.81% | 2.79% | 3.73% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 3.05% | 4.39% | 3.17% |
VPU Vanguard Utilities ETF | 2.64% | 2.73% | 3.02% | 3.49% | 2.98% | 2.70% | 3.17% | 2.83% | 3.23% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWR and VPU have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VPU has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to RWR (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWR dropped -74.92% vs VPU's -46.31%.
On 10-year performance, VPU leads with 9.06% vs 5.69% for RWR. On fees, VPU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, RWR has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VPU has performed better with a 9.06% return vs 5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VPU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for RWR.
RWR has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 2.64% for VPU.
RWR is categorized as REIT, while VPU is Utilities Equities. RWR tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, while VPU tracks MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RWR and 0.09% for VPU.
RWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWR and VPU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer