RWR vs. REIT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RWR (SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF) and REIT (ALPS Active REIT ETF) are both REIT funds. RWR is passively managed, while REIT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RWR returned 4.15%/yr vs 4.37%/yr for REIT. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. RWR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for REIT.

Performance

RWR vs. REIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWR achieves a 11.08% return, which is significantly lower than REIT's 12.80% return.

RWR

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 11.08%
• 6M: 9.50%
• 1Y: 15.44%
• 3Y*: 11.00%
• 5Y*: 4.15%
• 10Y*: 5.15%

REIT

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 12.80%
• 6M: 12.21%
• 1Y: 13.48%
• 3Y*: 10.38%
• 5Y*: 4.37%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWR vs. REIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF	11.08%	3.20%	7.74%	13.76%	-26.09%	38.45%
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF	12.80%	-0.55%	7.11%	13.74%	-21.23%	33.56%

Correlation

The correlation between RWR and REIT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2021	0.95

The correlation between RWR and REIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

RWR vs. REIT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RWR	REIT
Real Estate	98.6%	100.0%
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Utilities	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

RWR vs. REIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWR

RWR Risk / Return Rank: 34
RWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
RWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
RWR Omega Ratio Rank: 29
RWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
RWR Martin Ratio Rank: 41

REIT

REIT Risk / Return Rank: 31
REIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
REIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
REIT Omega Ratio Rank: 27
REIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
REIT Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWR vs. REIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RWR	REIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	1.06	+0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	1.46	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.19	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.93	1.84	+0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.55	5.33	+1.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RWR vs. REIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the REIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWR and REIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RWR	REIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.16	1.06	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.24	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.39	-0.08

Drawdowns

RWR vs. REIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWR drawdown since its inception was -74.92%, which is greater than REIT's maximum drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWR and REIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWR	REIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.92%	-29.30%	-45.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.04%	-7.35%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.85%	-18.19%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.58%	-29.30%	-3.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.09%	-2.65%	-0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.11%	-10.38%	-2.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	2.53%	-0.17%

Volatility

RWR vs. REIT - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) at 3.80%. This indicates that RWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWR	REIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.09%	3.80%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.51%	9.01%	+0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.39%	12.78%	+0.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.01%	18.45%	+0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.51%	18.38%	+3.13%

RWR vs. REIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than REIT's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWR vs. REIT - Dividend Comparison

RWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than REIT's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF	2.80%	3.20%	3.06%	3.13%	2.81%	4.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF	3.44%	3.78%	3.76%	3.75%	3.81%	2.79%	3.73%	3.36%	4.19%	3.05%	4.39%	3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWR and REIT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, RWR and REIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RWR or REIT?

RWR has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to REIT (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWR dropped -74.92% vs REIT's -29.30%.

Which ETF is better, RWR or REIT?

On 5-year performance, REIT leads with 4.37% vs 4.15% for RWR. On fees, RWR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, REIT has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RWR or REIT?

Over the 5-year period, REIT has performed better with a 4.37% return vs 4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RWR or REIT?

RWR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for REIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RWR or REIT?

RWR has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 2.80% for REIT.

What is the main difference between RWR and REIT?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and ALPS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RWR and 0.68% for REIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.