PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWR vs. PLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWR vs. PLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RWR having a 16.14% return and PLD slightly lower at 15.53%. Over the past 10 years, RWR has underperformed PLD with an annualized return of 5.51%, while PLD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.89% annualized return.


RWR

1D
1.31%
1M
1.96%
YTD
16.14%
6M
16.59%
1Y
19.02%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
4.96%
10Y*
5.51%

PLD

1D
0.99%
1M
0.28%
YTD
15.53%
6M
15.43%
1Y
39.98%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
6.71%
10Y*
14.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWR vs. PLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
16.14%3.20%7.74%13.76%-26.09%45.47%-11.40%22.71%-4.47%3.47%
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
15.53%25.08%-18.12%21.58%-31.33%72.33%14.74%55.87%-6.25%25.94%

Correlation

The correlation between RWR and PLD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2001

0.82

The correlation between RWR and PLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWR vs. PLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWR
RWR Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
RWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWR Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

PLD
PLD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWR vs. PLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and Prologis, Inc. (PLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RWRPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

4.19

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.03

13.76

-5.73

RWR vs. PLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the PLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWR and PLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWR vs. PLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWR drawdown since its inception was -74.92%, smaller than the maximum PLD drawdown of -84.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWR and PLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWRPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.92%

-84.70%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.04%

-9.59%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.85%

-31.37%

+12.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.58%

-43.30%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.39%

-43.30%

-1.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-4.36%

+3.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.08%

-17.35%

+4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

2.91%

-0.53%

Volatility

RWR vs. PLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) is 5.42%, while Prologis, Inc. (PLD) has a volatility of 7.52%. This indicates that RWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWRPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

7.52%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

15.07%

-4.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.05%

21.87%

-7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.05%

26.99%

-7.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.55%

27.02%

-5.47%

Dividends

RWR vs. PLD - Dividend Comparison

RWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than PLD's 2.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLD
Prologis, Inc.
2.86%3.16%3.63%2.61%2.80%1.50%2.33%2.38%3.27%2.73%3.18%3.54%
RWR
SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF
3.36%3.78%3.76%3.75%3.81%2.79%3.73%3.36%4.19%3.05%4.39%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWR and PLD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLD has higher volatility (7.52%) compared to RWR (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWR dropped -74.92% vs PLD's -84.70%.

PLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWR and PLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer