RWR vs. PIT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RWR (SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWR is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. RWR is passively managed, while PIT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, RWR returned 13.14%/yr vs 19.51%/yr for PIT. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RWR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.

Performance

RWR vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWR achieves a 14.64% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 27.31% return.

RWR

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 14.64%
• 6M: 14.73%
• 1Y: 19.15%
• 3Y*: 13.14%
• 5Y*: 4.64%
• 10Y*: 5.37%

PIT

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -10.60%
• YTD: 27.31%
• 6M: 26.74%
• 1Y: 38.33%
• 3Y*: 19.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWR vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF	14.64%	3.20%	7.74%	13.76%	0.09%
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	27.31%	21.63%	6.77%	-4.54%	1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RWR and PIT is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022	0.02

The correlation between RWR and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RWR vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWR

RWR Risk / Return Rank: 43
RWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
RWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
RWR Omega Ratio Rank: 37
RWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
RWR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

PIT

PIT Risk / Return Rank: 55
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWR vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RWR	PIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.78	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	2.32	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.32	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	2.74	-0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.08	10.88	-2.80

RWR vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWR Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWR and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RWR vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWR drawdown since its inception was -74.92%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -14.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWR and PIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWR	PIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.92%	-14.05%	-60.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.04%	-14.05%	+6.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.85%	-14.05%	-4.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.74%	-14.05%	+12.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.09%	-4.07%	-9.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	3.59%	-1.21%

Volatility

RWR vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF (RWR) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) at 4.67%. This indicates that RWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWR	PIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.27%	4.67%	+0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.32%	19.36%	-9.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.03%	21.66%	-7.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.04%	17.50%	+1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.55%	17.50%	+4.05%

RWR vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWR vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

RWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than PIT's 7.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF	7.00%	8.92%	3.59%	6.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RWR SPDR Dow Jones REIT ETF	4.23%	3.78%	3.76%	3.75%	3.81%	2.79%	3.73%	3.36%	4.19%	3.05%	4.39%	3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWR and PIT in my portfolio?

RWR and PIT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RWR or PIT?

RWR has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to PIT (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWR dropped -74.92% vs PIT's -14.05%.

Which ETF is better, RWR or PIT?

On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 19.51% vs 13.14% for RWR. On fees, RWR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PIT has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RWR or PIT?

Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 19.51% return vs 13.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RWR or PIT?

RWR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RWR or PIT?

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 4.23% for RWR.

What is the main difference between RWR and PIT?

RWR is categorized as REIT, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for RWR and 0.55% for PIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.