PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWMIX vs. RWIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWMIX vs. RWIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redwood Managed Municipal Income Fund (RWMIX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWMIX achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly lower than RWIIX's 8.02% return.


RWMIX

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.70%
6M
-1.54%
YTD
-1.00%
1Y
1.52%
3Y*
1.30%
5Y*
-1.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.14%

RWIIX

1D
1.08%
1M
1.89%
6M
3.85%
YTD
8.02%
1Y
18.70%
3Y*
3.06%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RWMIX vs. RWIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWMIX
Redwood Managed Municipal Income Fund
-1.00%-2.18%2.69%3.77%-9.56%4.28%0.13%10.09%0.30%0.63%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
8.02%7.87%-6.03%9.07%-11.57%10.68%14.57%4.58%-2.46%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between RWMIX and RWIIX is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2017

0.07

Over the past year, RWMIX and RWIIX have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWMIX vs. RWIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RWMIX
RWMIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
RWMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RWMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

RWIIX
RWIIX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
RWIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
RWIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RWMIX vs. RWIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood Managed Municipal Income Fund (RWMIX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RWMIXRWIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.28

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

2.48

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.25

6.02

-4.77

RWMIX vs. RWIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWMIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the RWIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWMIX and RWIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWMIX vs. RWIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWMIX drawdown since its inception was -12.90%, smaller than the maximum RWIIX drawdown of -20.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWMIX and RWIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWMIXRWIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

-20.34%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.01%

-6.94%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.09%

-20.34%

+12.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.90%

-20.34%

+7.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.04%

-1.89%

-6.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-7.73%

+2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

2.86%

-1.64%

Volatility

RWMIX vs. RWIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Redwood Managed Municipal Income Fund (RWMIX) is 0.95%, while Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) has a volatility of 3.20%. This indicates that RWMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWMIXRWIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

3.20%

-2.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.89%

9.42%

-7.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27%

11.68%

-9.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.95%

11.70%

-7.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.51%

10.98%

-7.47%

RWMIX vs. RWIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWMIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than RWIIX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWMIX vs. RWIIX - Dividend Comparison

RWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, less than RWIIX's 8.09% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
8.09%8.74%0.00%6.82%1.72%14.15%6.51%1.84%0.86%0.02%
RWMIX
Redwood Managed Municipal Income Fund
4.03%2.67%4.08%2.80%1.02%6.80%2.16%3.36%2.13%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWMIX and RWIIX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RWIIX has higher volatility (3.20%) compared to RWMIX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWMIX dropped -12.90% vs RWIIX's -20.34%.

RWIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWMIX and RWIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer