PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWMGX vs. RERGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWMGX vs. RERGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWMGX achieves a 6.01% return, which is significantly lower than RERGX's 12.33% return. Over the past 10 years, RWMGX has outperformed RERGX with an annualized return of 13.22%, while RERGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.21% annualized return.


RWMGX

1D
0.39%
1M
2.82%
YTD
6.01%
6M
6.16%
1Y
17.89%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
13.22%

RERGX

1D
0.55%
1M
6.76%
YTD
12.33%
6M
15.06%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWMGX vs. RERGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWMGX
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6
6.01%17.56%19.35%17.58%-8.17%28.84%8.02%25.78%-5.91%20.38%
RERGX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6
12.33%29.34%3.00%16.11%-22.77%2.84%25.27%27.40%-17.33%31.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RWMGX and RERGX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.77

The correlation between RWMGX and RERGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWMGX vs. RERGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWMGX
RWMGX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RWMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RWMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

RERGX
RERGX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
RERGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RERGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RERGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RERGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RERGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWMGX vs. RERGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWMGXRERGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

1.89

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.58

2.69

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.32

-0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.68

8.74

+0.94

RWMGX vs. RERGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the RERGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWMGX and RERGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWMGXRERGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.89

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.32

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.55

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.43

+0.40

Drawdowns

RWMGX vs. RERGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWMGX drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, smaller than the maximum RERGX drawdown of -37.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWMGX and RERGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWMGXRERGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

-37.30%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-12.52%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.61%

-15.62%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.46%

-37.30%

+18.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

-37.30%

+2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-9.21%

+6.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

3.31%

-1.39%

Volatility

RWMGX vs. RERGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX) is 2.42%, while American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that RWMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RERGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWMGXRERGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

5.40%

-2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

12.91%

-5.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

15.38%

-5.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.10%

16.67%

-2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

16.93%

-0.60%

RWMGX vs. RERGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWMGX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than RERGX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWMGX vs. RERGX - Dividend Comparison

RWMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.82%, less than RERGX's 12.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RERGX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6
12.42%13.95%4.96%3.95%2.02%10.19%0.41%3.14%3.17%4.99%1.64%3.43%
RWMGX
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6
9.82%10.36%10.36%6.42%6.63%6.33%3.35%6.91%4.67%7.52%6.66%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWMGX and RERGX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RERGX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to RWMGX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWMGX dropped -34.64% vs RERGX's -37.30%.

RERGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWMGX and RERGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer