PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWMGX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWMGX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWMGX achieves a 6.01% return, which is significantly lower than FSKAX's 12.08% return. Over the past 10 years, RWMGX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 13.22%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.09% annualized return.


RWMGX

1D
0.39%
1M
2.82%
YTD
6.01%
6M
6.16%
1Y
17.89%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
13.22%

FSKAX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.80%
YTD
12.08%
6M
11.98%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
15.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWMGX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWMGX
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6
6.01%17.56%19.35%17.58%-8.17%28.84%8.02%25.78%-5.91%20.38%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
12.08%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between RWMGX and FSKAX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.95

The correlation between RWMGX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWMGX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWMGX
RWMGX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RWMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RWMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWMGX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWMGXFSKAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

2.46

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.58

3.35

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.44

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

3.38

-1.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.68

15.52

-5.84

RWMGX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWMGX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWMGXFSKAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

2.46

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.76

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.82

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.85

-0.03

Drawdowns

RWMGX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWMGX drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, roughly equal to the maximum FSKAX drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWMGX and FSKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWMGXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

-35.01%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.35%

-8.92%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.61%

-19.43%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.46%

-25.39%

+6.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.64%

-35.01%

+0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-4.02%

+0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.94%

-0.02%

Volatility

RWMGX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX) is 2.42%, while Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that RWMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWMGXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

2.97%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

9.23%

-1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.32%

12.26%

-1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.10%

17.41%

-3.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

18.46%

-2.13%

RWMGX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWMGX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RWMGX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

RWMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.82%, more than FSKAX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%
RWMGX
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6
9.82%10.36%10.36%6.42%6.63%6.33%3.35%6.91%4.67%7.52%6.66%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWMGX and FSKAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSKAX has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to RWMGX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWMGX dropped -34.64% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

FSKAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWMGX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer