RWM vs. YXI
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI).
RWM and YXI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RWM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 (-100%). It was launched on Jan 23, 2007. YXI is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%). It was launched on Mar 16, 2010. Both RWM and YXI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RWM vs. YXI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RWM vs. YXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000 | -0.52% | -9.40% | -5.91% | -10.43% | 18.34% | -17.90% | -31.04% | -19.83% | 11.57% | -13.61% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 6.45% | -22.87% | -25.36% | 12.40% | 4.78% | 13.94% | -17.95% | -14.35% | 9.63% | -28.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWM achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than YXI's 6.45% return. Over the past 10 years, RWM has underperformed YXI with an annualized return of -11.01%, while YXI has yielded a comparatively higher -8.57% annualized return.
RWM
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -19.15%
- 3Y*
- -8.15%
- 5Y*
- -2.92%
- 10Y*
- -11.01%
YXI
- 1D
- -3.53%
- 1M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- 6.45%
- 6M
- 13.83%
- 1Y
- -2.92%
- 3Y*
- -10.01%
- 5Y*
- -2.92%
- 10Y*
- -8.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RWM vs. YXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RWM and YXI have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
RWM vs. YXI — Risk / Return Rank
RWM
YXI
RWM vs. YXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWM | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | -0.12 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | -0.01 | -1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.00 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | -0.10 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | -0.13 | -0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWM | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | -0.12 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | -0.09 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.48 | -0.31 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | -0.31 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between RWM and YXI is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RWM vs. YXI - Dividend Comparison
RWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than YXI's 2.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000 | 3.57% | 3.97% | 6.03% | 4.78% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.55% | 0.87% | 0.07% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.89% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RWM vs. YXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWM drawdown since its inception was -95.12%, which is greater than YXI's maximum drawdown of -81.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWM and YXI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWM | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.12% | -81.15% | -13.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.53% | -29.83% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.80% | -57.65% | +20.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.94% | -66.81% | -5.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.70% | -78.26% | -16.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.85% | -54.04% | -19.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.23% | 22.94% | +2.29% |
Volatility
RWM vs. YXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) is 7.47%, while ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) has a volatility of 7.90%. This indicates that RWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RWM | YXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 7.90% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.43% | 14.78% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.18% | 23.75% | -0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 31.35% | -8.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.07% | 27.46% | -4.39% |