RWM vs. SHRT
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT).
RWM and SHRT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RWM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 (-100%). It was launched on Jan 23, 2007. SHRT is an actively managed fund by Gotham. It was launched on Jul 31, 2017.
Performance
RWM vs. SHRT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RWM vs. SHRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000 | -0.52% | -9.40% | -5.91% | -14.00% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | -2.73% | -0.91% | -1.44% | -5.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWM achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly higher than SHRT's -2.73% return.
RWM
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -19.15%
- 3Y*
- -8.15%
- 5Y*
- -2.92%
- 10Y*
- -11.01%
SHRT
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- YTD
- -2.73%
- 6M
- -1.63%
- 1Y
- -8.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RWM vs. SHRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRT's 1.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RWM vs. SHRT — Risk / Return Rank
RWM
SHRT
RWM vs. SHRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWM | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | -0.61 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | -0.84 | -0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.91 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | -0.49 | -0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | -0.89 | +0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWM | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | -0.61 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.46 | -0.36 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between RWM and SHRT is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RWM vs. SHRT - Dividend Comparison
RWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, more than SHRT's 0.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWM ProShares Short Russell2000 | 3.57% | 3.97% | 6.03% | 4.78% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.55% | 0.87% | 0.07% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.85% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RWM vs. SHRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWM drawdown since its inception was -95.12%, which is greater than SHRT's maximum drawdown of -18.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWM and SHRT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWM | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.12% | -18.97% | -76.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.53% | -17.65% | -16.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.70% | -12.77% | -81.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.85% | -7.21% | -66.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.23% | 9.62% | +15.61% |
Volatility
RWM vs. SHRT - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) at 6.06%. This indicates that RWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RWM | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 6.06% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.43% | 10.51% | +3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.18% | 14.59% | +8.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 12.66% | +9.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.07% | 12.66% | +10.41% |