PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWM vs. BTC-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RWM vs. BTC-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWM achieves a -15.00% return, which is significantly higher than BTC-USD's -23.17% return. Over the past 10 years, RWM has underperformed BTC-USD with an annualized return of -11.97%, while BTC-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 60.98% annualized return.


RWM

1D
-0.86%
1M
-4.02%
YTD
-15.00%
6M
-15.34%
1Y
-28.11%
3Y*
-12.50%
5Y*
-5.55%
10Y*
-11.97%

BTC-USD

1D
0.85%
1M
-14.42%
YTD
-23.17%
6M
-26.37%
1Y
-36.52%
3Y*
35.33%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
60.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWM vs. BTC-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWM
ProShares Short Russell2000
-15.00%-9.40%-5.91%-10.43%18.34%-17.90%-31.04%-19.83%11.57%-13.61%
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
-23.17%-6.27%120.76%155.82%-64.23%59.40%304.57%94.10%-73.37%1,324.24%

Correlation

The correlation between RWM and BTC-USD is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2012

-0.14

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between RWM and BTC-USD has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.14 to -0.41, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWM vs. BTC-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWM
RWM Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
RWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWM Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
RWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWM Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

BTC-USD
BTC-USD Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWM vs. BTC-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RWMBTC-USDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.48

-0.85

-0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-2.14

-1.14

-1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

0.88

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

-1.07

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.70

-1.57

-0.13

RWM vs. BTC-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWM Sharpe Ratio is -1.48, which is lower than the BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWM and BTC-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RWMBTC-USDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.48

-0.85

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

0.24

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.52

0.89

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

1.14

-1.63

Drawdowns

RWM vs. BTC-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWM drawdown since its inception was -95.47%, which is greater than BTC-USD's maximum drawdown of -85.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWM and BTC-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWMBTC-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.47%

-85.30%

-10.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.26%

-49.65%

+22.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.38%

-49.65%

+8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.38%

-76.67%

+35.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.72%

-83.80%

+10.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.47%

-46.10%

-49.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.04%

-42.27%

-31.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.63%

33.71%

-17.08%

Volatility

RWM vs. BTC-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) is 5.68%, while Bitcoin (BTC-USD) has a volatility of 9.90%. This indicates that RWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTC-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWMBTC-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

9.90%

-4.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.50%

33.98%

-20.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.01%

35.37%

-16.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.55%

45.01%

-22.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.11%

56.68%

-33.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWM and BTC-USD have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTC-USD has higher volatility (9.90%) compared to RWM (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWM dropped -95.47% vs BTC-USD's -85.30%.

BTC-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.85 vs -1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWM and BTC-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer