PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWM vs. BTC-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RWM vs. BTC-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWM achieves a -16.04% return, which is significantly higher than BTC-USD's -27.65% return. Over the past 10 years, RWM has underperformed BTC-USD with an annualized return of -11.48%, while BTC-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 59.80% annualized return.


RWM

1D
-1.60%
1M
0.82%
6M
-10.93%
YTD
-16.04%
1Y
-26.16%
3Y*
-11.17%
5Y*
-6.29%
10Y*
-11.48%
ALL TIME*
-12.05%

BTC-USD

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.35%
6M
-19.52%
YTD
-27.65%
1Y
-44.57%
3Y*
29.61%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
59.80%
ALL TIME*
87.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

BTC-USD

Bitcoin
$1541.04T$1614.90T$2068.30T
$356.63M$306.99M$253.47M

RWM vs. BTC-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWM
ProShares Short Russell2000
-16.04%-9.40%-5.91%-10.43%18.34%-17.90%-31.04%-19.83%11.57%-13.61%
BTC-USD
Bitcoin
-27.65%-6.27%120.76%155.82%-64.23%59.40%304.57%94.10%-73.37%1,324.24%

Correlation

The correlation between RWM and BTC-USD is -0.38, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2012

-0.14

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between RWM and BTC-USD has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.14 to -0.38, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWM vs. BTC-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RWM
RWM Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
RWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWM Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
RWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWM Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

BTC-USD
BTC-USD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTC-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RWM vs. BTC-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) and Bitcoin (BTC-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RWMBTC-USDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

0.85

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.01

-0.84

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.68

-1.29

-0.39

RWM vs. BTC-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWM Sharpe Ratio is -1.37, which is lower than the BTC-USD Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWM and BTC-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWM vs. BTC-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWM drawdown since its inception was -95.61%, which is greater than BTC-USD's maximum drawdown of -85.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWM and BTC-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWMBTC-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.61%

-85.30%

-10.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.97%

-53.08%

+27.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.12%

-53.08%

+9.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.12%

-76.67%

+33.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.51%

-83.80%

+11.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.52%

-49.24%

-46.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.21%

-42.74%

-31.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.24%

25.03%

-7.79%

Volatility

RWM vs. BTC-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short Russell2000 (RWM) is 4.04%, while Bitcoin (BTC-USD) has a volatility of 8.46%. This indicates that RWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTC-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWMBTC-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

8.46%

-4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.08%

33.65%

-19.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.24%

35.87%

-16.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.52%

43.64%

-21.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.10%

56.22%

-33.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWM and BTC-USD have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTC-USD has higher volatility (8.46%) compared to RWM (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWM dropped -95.61% vs BTC-USD's -85.30%.

BTC-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.03 vs -1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWM and BTC-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer