RWL vs. FXAIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RWL (Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF) and FXAIX (Fidelity 500 Index Fund) are both S&P 500 funds - RWL tracks the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index while FXAIX tracks the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RWL returned 14.31%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for FXAIX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RWL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FXAIX.

Performance

RWL vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWL achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than FXAIX's 10.19% return. Over the past 10 years, RWL has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 14.31%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.

RWL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 11.62%
• 6M: 11.23%
• 1Y: 26.48%
• 3Y*: 19.53%
• 5Y*: 13.46%
• 10Y*: 14.31%

FXAIX

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 10.19%
• 6M: 9.68%
• 1Y: 27.18%
• 3Y*: 20.98%
• 5Y*: 14.10%
• 10Y*: 15.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWL vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RWL Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF	11.62%	18.65%	16.45%	17.43%	-6.00%	30.29%	9.14%	27.83%	-7.74%	20.34%
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund	10.19%	17.84%	25.01%	26.29%	-18.14%	28.71%	18.42%	31.48%	-4.43%	21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between RWL and FXAIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2011	0.91

The correlation between RWL and FXAIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RWL vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWL

RWL Risk / Return Rank: 83
RWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
RWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
RWL Omega Ratio Rank: 81
RWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
RWL Martin Ratio Rank: 85

FXAIX

FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWL vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RWL	FXAIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	2.17	+0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.61	2.93	+0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.39	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.01	3.04	+0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.81	13.75	+3.06

RWL vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWL Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWL and FXAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RWL vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWL drawdown since its inception was -54.83%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWL and FXAIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWL	FXAIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.83%	-33.79%	-21.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.64%	-8.89%	+2.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.39%	-18.76%	+4.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.49%	-24.50%	+7.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.04%	-33.79%	-2.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.66%	-1.36%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.43%	-3.79%	-2.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	1.96%	-0.38%

Volatility

RWL vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) is 3.16%, while Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that RWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWL	FXAIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.16%	4.77%	-1.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.43%	9.91%	-2.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.22%	12.47%	-2.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.51%	17.01%	-2.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	18.11%	-1.23%

RWL vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWL vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

RWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than FXAIX's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund	1.04%	1.11%	1.25%	1.45%	1.69%	1.22%	1.60%	2.06%	2.72%	1.97%	2.52%	2.83%
RWL Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF	1.55%	1.35%	1.43%	1.60%	1.62%	1.35%	1.75%	1.87%	1.99%	1.60%	1.71%	1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWL and FXAIX in my portfolio?

RWL and FXAIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RWL or FXAIX?

FXAIX has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to RWL (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWL dropped -54.83% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.