RWIIX vs. QFVOX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RWIIX (Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund) and QFVOX (Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RWIIX returned 1.72%/yr vs 10.30%/yr for QFVOX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RWIIX charges 1.22%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for QFVOX.

Performance

RWIIX vs. QFVOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWIIX achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly lower than QFVOX's 18.89% return.

RWIIX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 2.74%
• YTD: 9.71%
• 6M: 13.00%
• 1Y: 23.15%
• 3Y*: 5.38%
• 5Y*: 1.72%
• 10Y*: —

QFVOX

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 5.29%
• YTD: 18.89%
• 6M: 24.43%
• 1Y: 38.58%
• 3Y*: 20.62%
• 5Y*: 10.30%
• 10Y*: 9.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWIIX vs. QFVOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RWIIX Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund	9.71%	7.87%	-6.03%	9.07%	-11.57%	10.68%	14.57%	4.58%	-2.46%	0.62%
QFVOX Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund	18.89%	33.85%	-0.70%	19.88%	-17.14%	19.44%	2.65%	17.93%	-13.28%	0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between RWIIX and QFVOX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2017	0.62

The correlation between RWIIX and QFVOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.76 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RWIIX vs. QFVOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWIIX

RWIIX Risk / Return Rank: 54
RWIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
RWIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
RWIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
RWIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
RWIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

QFVOX

QFVOX Risk / Return Rank: 76
QFVOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
QFVOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
QFVOX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
QFVOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
QFVOX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWIIX vs. QFVOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RWIIX	QFVOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	2.70	-0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	3.75	-0.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.51	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	3.53	-0.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.90	12.51	-3.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RWIIX vs. QFVOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWIIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the QFVOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWIIX and QFVOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RWIIX	QFVOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	2.70	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	0.67	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.40	-0.03

Drawdowns

RWIIX vs. QFVOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWIIX drawdown since its inception was -20.34%, smaller than the maximum QFVOX drawdown of -70.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWIIX and QFVOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RWIIX	QFVOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.34%	-70.51%	+50.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.94%	-11.02%	+4.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.34%	-14.92%	-5.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.34%	-32.90%	+12.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-0.32%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.82%	-15.30%	+7.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	3.11%	-0.52%

Volatility

RWIIX vs. QFVOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) is 3.56%, while Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that RWIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFVOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RWIIX	QFVOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.56%	4.84%	-1.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.35%	12.55%	-4.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.08%	14.71%	-3.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.53%	15.49%	-3.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.92%	16.83%	-5.91%

RWIIX vs. QFVOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWIIX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than QFVOX's 1.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

RWIIX vs. QFVOX - Dividend Comparison

RWIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than QFVOX's 4.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QFVOX Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund	4.76%	5.66%	1.95%	1.88%	1.43%	10.11%	1.58%	1.14%	0.98%	0.60%	1.02%	1.58%
RWIIX Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund	7.96%	8.74%	0.00%	6.82%	1.72%	14.15%	6.51%	1.84%	0.86%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RWIIX and QFVOX in my portfolio?

RWIIX and QFVOX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RWIIX or QFVOX?

QFVOX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to RWIIX (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWIIX dropped -20.34% vs QFVOX's -70.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QFVOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.