RWEM vs. IBIC
RWEM (Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RWEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FT Wilshire Emerging Large NxtGen Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RWEM returned 56.82% vs 4.54% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. RWEM charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
RWEM vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWEM achieves a 26.61% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.37% return.
RWEM
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 12.70%
- YTD
- 26.61%
- 6M
- 37.26%
- 1Y
- 56.82%
- 3Y*
- 25.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 2.51%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RWEM vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RWEM Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 26.61% | 28.17% | 7.24% | 8.35% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.37% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWEM and IBIC is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023 | -0.02 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between RWEM and IBIC has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.02 to -0.26, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWEM vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
RWEM
IBIC
RWEM vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWEM | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 2.24 | -0.90 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 17.27 | -13.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.99 | 67.45 | -55.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWEM | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 5.05 | -3.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 3.49 | -2.90 |
Drawdowns
RWEM vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWEM drawdown since its inception was -26.92%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWEM and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWEM | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.92% | -0.90% | -26.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.39% | -0.26% | -15.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -0.10% | -9.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.75% | 0.07% | +4.68% |
Volatility
RWEM vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM) has a higher volatility of 8.57% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that RWEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWEM | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.57% | 0.33% | +8.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.47% | 0.67% | +28.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.82% | 0.90% | +30.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.36% | 1.58% | +19.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.36% | 1.58% | +19.78% |
RWEM vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWEM has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWEM vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
RWEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.59% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWEM Rayliant Wilshire NxtGen Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.70% | 2.15% | 3.59% | 1.60% | 5.59% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWEM and IBIC have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RWEM has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWEM dropped -26.92% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, RWEM leads with 56.82% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RWEM has performed better with a 56.82% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RWEM.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.70% for RWEM.
RWEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. RWEM tracks FT Wilshire Emerging Large NxtGen Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Rayliant and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for RWEM and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWEM and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer