RWCEX vs. LVAZX
RWCEX (Redwheel Global Emerging Equity Fund) and LVAZX (LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, RWCEX returned 2.03%/yr vs 16.04%/yr for LVAZX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RWCEX charges 1.22%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for LVAZX.
Performance
RWCEX vs. LVAZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWCEX achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly lower than LVAZX's 36.52% return.
RWCEX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- 5.10%
- YTD
- 15.11%
- 6M
- 17.36%
- 1Y
- 44.55%
- 3Y*
- 18.03%
- 5Y*
- 2.03%
- 10Y*
- —
LVAZX
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 13.46%
- YTD
- 36.52%
- 6M
- 41.03%
- 1Y
- 69.73%
- 3Y*
- 32.01%
- 5Y*
- 16.04%
- 10Y*
- —
RWCEX vs. LVAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWCEX Redwheel Global Emerging Equity Fund | 15.11% | 40.13% | -1.85% | 5.59% | -24.47% | -5.10% | 34.62% | 13.43% |
LVAZX LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 36.52% | 39.90% | 7.26% | 21.26% | -13.03% | 13.77% | 5.03% | 5.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between RWCEX and LVAZX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between RWCEX and LVAZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RWCEX vs. LVAZX — Risk / Return Rank
RWCEX
LVAZX
RWCEX vs. LVAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwheel Global Emerging Equity Fund (RWCEX) and LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund (LVAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RWCEX | LVAZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.84 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 6.16 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.53 | 24.21 | -13.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RWCEX | LVAZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 4.45 | -2.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 1.12 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.92 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
RWCEX vs. LVAZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWCEX drawdown since its inception was -46.08%, which is greater than LVAZX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWCEX and LVAZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RWCEX | LVAZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.08% | -37.87% | -8.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.62% | -11.44% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -15.02% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.79% | -27.07% | -15.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | 0.00% | -1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.30% | -6.78% | -13.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 2.91% | +1.38% |
Volatility
RWCEX vs. LVAZX - Volatility Comparison
Redwheel Global Emerging Equity Fund (RWCEX) and LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund (LVAZX) have volatilities of 6.83% and 7.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RWCEX | LVAZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 7.12% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.59% | 13.54% | +2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 15.84% | +3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 14.36% | +6.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.67% | 15.92% | +4.75% |
RWCEX vs. LVAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RWCEX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than LVAZX's 1.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
RWCEX vs. LVAZX - Dividend Comparison
RWCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than LVAZX's 3.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVAZX LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund | 3.75% | 5.12% | 1.39% | 4.58% | 3.14% | 8.50% | 2.54% | 2.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWCEX Redwheel Global Emerging Equity Fund | 0.83% | 0.96% | 1.27% | 0.68% | 0.54% | 16.01% | 0.24% | 0.49% | 0.14% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RWCEX and LVAZX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVAZX has higher volatility (7.12%) compared to RWCEX (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWCEX dropped -46.08% vs LVAZX's -37.87%.
LVAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.45 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RWCEX and LVAZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer