PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
RWCEX vs. EMIM.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RWCEX and EMIM.L is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.8

Performance

RWCEX vs. EMIM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Redwheel Global Emerging Equity Fund (RWCEX) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.81%
3.04%
RWCEX
EMIM.L

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RWCEX:

0.39

EMIM.L:

1.13

Sortino Ratio

RWCEX:

0.66

EMIM.L:

1.64

Omega Ratio

RWCEX:

1.08

EMIM.L:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

RWCEX:

0.16

EMIM.L:

1.06

Martin Ratio

RWCEX:

0.81

EMIM.L:

4.54

Ulcer Index

RWCEX:

8.54%

EMIM.L:

3.17%

Daily Std Dev

RWCEX:

17.67%

EMIM.L:

12.87%

Max Drawdown

RWCEX:

-51.33%

EMIM.L:

-31.70%

Current Drawdown

RWCEX:

-39.53%

EMIM.L:

-2.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWCEX achieves a 4.50% return, which is significantly higher than EMIM.L's 3.45% return.


RWCEX

YTD

4.50%

1M

6.23%

6M

1.53%

1Y

6.11%

5Y*

-1.73%

10Y*

N/A

EMIM.L

YTD

3.45%

1M

3.41%

6M

6.18%

1Y

12.23%

5Y*

4.24%

10Y*

5.99%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RWCEX vs. EMIM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWCEX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than EMIM.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


RWCEX
Redwheel Global Emerging Equity Fund
Expense ratio chart for RWCEX: current value at 1.22% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.22%
Expense ratio chart for EMIM.L: current value at 0.18% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.18%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

RWCEX vs. EMIM.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWCEX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RWCEX is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RWCEX is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RWCEX is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RWCEX is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RWCEX is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RWCEX is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

EMIM.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EMIM.L is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EMIM.L is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EMIM.L is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EMIM.L is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EMIM.L is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EMIM.L is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RWCEX vs. EMIM.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Redwheel Global Emerging Equity Fund (RWCEX) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for RWCEX, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.310.72
The chart of Sortino ratio for RWCEX, currently valued at 0.54, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.541.10
The chart of Omega ratio for RWCEX, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.071.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for RWCEX, currently valued at 0.12, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.120.48
The chart of Martin ratio for RWCEX, currently valued at 0.62, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.000.622.11
RWCEX
EMIM.L

The current RWCEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the EMIM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWCEX and EMIM.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.31
0.72
RWCEX
EMIM.L

Dividends

RWCEX vs. EMIM.L - Dividend Comparison

RWCEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while EMIM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
RWCEX
Redwheel Global Emerging Equity Fund
1.21%1.26%0.68%0.54%2.28%0.24%0.49%0.15%0.39%
EMIM.L
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RWCEX vs. EMIM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWCEX drawdown since its inception was -51.33%, which is greater than EMIM.L's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWCEX and EMIM.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-39.53%
-12.81%
RWCEX
EMIM.L

Volatility

RWCEX vs. EMIM.L - Volatility Comparison

Redwheel Global Emerging Equity Fund (RWCEX) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (EMIM.L) have volatilities of 3.98% and 3.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.98%
3.82%
RWCEX
EMIM.L
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab