RVNU vs. TAXT
RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) and TAXT (Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - RVNU tracks the Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index while TAXT tracks the ICE Focused Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RVNU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TAXT.
Performance
RVNU vs. TAXT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RVNU achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly higher than TAXT's 1.49% return.
RVNU
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 9.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
TAXT
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RVNU vs. TAXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.71% | 5.37% |
TAXT Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.49% | 3.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between RVNU and TAXT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RVNU vs. TAXT — Risk / Return Rank
RVNU
TAXT
RVNU vs. TAXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RVNU | TAXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.89 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.83 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RVNU | TAXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 2.80 | -2.41 |
Drawdowns
RVNU vs. TAXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RVNU drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, which is greater than TAXT's maximum drawdown of -2.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVNU and TAXT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RVNU | TAXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.51% | -2.49% | -21.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -0.58% | -2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -0.47% | -4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility
RVNU vs. TAXT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RVNU | TAXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.41% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.12% | 2.53% | +2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.19% | 2.53% | +4.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.27% | 2.53% | +4.74% |
RVNU vs. TAXT - Expense Ratio Comparison
RVNU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXT's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RVNU vs. TAXT - Dividend Comparison
RVNU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than TAXT's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.52% | 3.46% | 3.06% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.18% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 2.76% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 3.01% |
TAXT Northern Trust Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 2.55% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RVNU and TAXT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for RVNU.
RVNU has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 2.55% for TAXT.
RVNU tracks Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index, while TAXT tracks ICE Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for RVNU and 0.05% for TAXT.
Find the right allocation for RVNU and TAXT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer