RVNU vs. RJMI
RVNU (Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF) and RJMI (RJ Eagle Municipal Income ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. RVNU is passively managed, while RJMI is actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RVNU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for RJMI.
Performance
RVNU vs. RJMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RVNU achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly higher than RJMI's 1.70% return.
RVNU
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 10.00%
- 3Y*
- 3.67%
- 5Y*
- -0.18%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
RJMI
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RVNU vs. RJMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.76% | 0.67% |
RJMI RJ Eagle Municipal Income ETF | 1.70% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between RVNU and RJMI is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RVNU vs. RJMI — Risk / Return Rank
RVNU
RJMI
RVNU vs. RJMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) and RJ Eagle Municipal Income ETF (RJMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RVNU | RJMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.96 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.94 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RVNU | RJMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 2.28 | -1.89 |
Drawdowns
RVNU vs. RJMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RVNU drawdown since its inception was -23.51%, which is greater than RJMI's maximum drawdown of -3.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVNU and RJMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RVNU | RJMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.51% | -3.04% | -20.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -0.54% | -2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -0.67% | -4.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | — | — |
Volatility
RVNU vs. RJMI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RVNU | RJMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.20% | 3.08% | +2.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.19% | 3.08% | +4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.28% | 3.08% | +4.20% |
RVNU vs. RJMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RVNU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RJMI's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
RVNU vs. RJMI - Dividend Comparison
RVNU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than RJMI's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RJMI RJ Eagle Municipal Income ETF | 1.95% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RVNU Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF | 3.51% | 3.46% | 3.06% | 2.79% | 2.81% | 2.18% | 2.43% | 2.75% | 2.76% | 2.49% | 2.72% | 3.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RVNU and RJMI have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RVNU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RVNU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for RJMI.
RVNU has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 1.95% for RJMI.
They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Carillon Tower Advisers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for RVNU and 0.41% for RJMI.
Find the right allocation for RVNU and RJMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer