RVNL vs. NTSD
RVNL (GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RVNL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
RVNL vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RVNL
- 1D
- -19.35%
- 1M
- 21.38%
- YTD
- -45.20%
- 6M
- -37.35%
- 1Y
- -16.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RVNL vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RVNL GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF | -6.98% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 14.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between RVNL and NTSD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RVNL vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
RVNL
NTSD
RVNL vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long RIVN Daily ETF (RVNL) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RVNL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RVNL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 3.59 | -3.45 |
Drawdowns
RVNL vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RVNL drawdown since its inception was -72.92%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVNL and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RVNL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.92% | -5.20% | -67.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.98% | -3.72% | -54.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.22% | -0.88% | -39.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.30% | — | — |
Volatility
RVNL vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RVNL | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 93.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 127.61% | 25.41% | +102.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 125.00% | 25.41% | +99.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 125.00% | 25.41% | +99.59% |
RVNL vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RVNL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RVNL vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither RVNL nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RVNL and NTSD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for RVNL.
RVNL and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for RVNL and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for RVNL and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer