RVLV vs. IBIT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RVLV (Revolve Group, Inc.) is a stock, while IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Over the past year, RVLV returned 1.71% vs -37.79% for IBIT. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RVLV vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Revolve Group, Inc. (RVLV) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RVLV achieves a -31.14% return, which is significantly lower than IBIT's -26.49% return.

RVLV

• 1D: -4.59%
• 1M: 8.11%
• YTD: -31.14%
• 6M: -30.00%
• 1Y: 1.71%
• 3Y*: 10.47%
• 5Y*: -21.03%
• 10Y*: —

IBIT

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: -15.04%
• YTD: -26.49%
• 6M: -27.13%
• 1Y: -37.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RVLV vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RVLV Revolve Group, Inc.	-31.14%	-9.85%	126.13%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-26.49%	-6.41%	89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between RVLV and IBIT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.24

Return for Risk

RVLV vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RVLV

RVLV Risk / Return Rank: 42
RVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
RVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
RVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 40
RVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
RVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 43

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 3
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RVLV vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Revolve Group, Inc. (RVLV) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RVLV	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	-0.86	+0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.42	-1.16	+1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	0.87	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	-0.73	+0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.09	-1.24	+1.34

RVLV vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RVLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RVLV and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RVLV vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RVLV drawdown since its inception was -85.74%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RVLV and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RVLV	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.74%	-52.11%	-33.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.32%	-52.11%	+7.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.32%	-48.80%	-27.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.94%	-16.79%	-43.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.21%	30.41%	-12.20%

Volatility

RVLV vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Revolve Group, Inc. (RVLV) is 12.09%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 13.00%. This indicates that RVLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RVLV	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.09%	13.00%	-0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.08%	34.53%	+2.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.77%	44.29%	+6.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.21%	50.21%	+11.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.16%	50.21%	+17.95%

Dividends

RVLV vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

Neither RVLV nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RVLV and IBIT in my portfolio?

RVLV and IBIT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RVLV or IBIT?

IBIT has higher volatility (13.00%) compared to RVLV (12.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RVLV dropped -85.74% vs IBIT's -52.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.