RULE vs. DBO
RULE (Adaptive Core ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RULE is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Mohr Funds, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. RULE is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RULE returned 20.12%/yr vs 20.95%/yr for DBO. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. RULE charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
RULE vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RULE achieves a 44.43% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 80.66% return.
RULE
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- 20.61%
- YTD
- 44.43%
- 6M
- 45.11%
- 1Y
- 51.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 80.66%
- 6M
- 78.46%
- 1Y
- 78.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 15.57%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
RULE vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RULE Adaptive Core ETF | 44.43% | 4.60% | 7.59% | 6.29% | -22.87% | 1.03% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 80.66% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | -7.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between RULE and DBO is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021 | -0.00 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between RULE and DBO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.00 to -0.21, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
RULE vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RULE
DBO
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
RULE
DBO
-
Industrials
RULE
DBO
-
Basic Materials
RULE
DBO
-
Healthcare
RULE
DBO
-
Financial Services
RULE
DBO
Communication Services
RULE
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
RULE
DBO
-
Energy
RULE
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
RULE
DBO
-
Utilities
RULE
DBO
-
Real Estate
RULE
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RULE vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
RULE
DBO
RULE vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RULE | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.58 | 2.28 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.46 | 2.88 | +0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.37 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 4.62 | -0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.91 | 9.43 | +7.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RULE | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 2.28 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.02 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
RULE vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RULE drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RULE and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RULE | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.48% | -90.18% | +59.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.65% | -18.19% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.21% | -28.20% | +7.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -52.46% | +52.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.99% | -62.25% | +47.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 8.92% | -5.83% |
Volatility
RULE vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) is 9.65%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 13.25%. This indicates that RULE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RULE | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.65% | 13.25% | -3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.55% | 28.15% | -10.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.25% | 34.54% | -14.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 32.28% | -17.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.83% | 31.78% | -16.95% |
RULE vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RULE has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
RULE vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
RULE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.94% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
RULE Adaptive Core ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RULE and DBO have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to RULE (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RULE dropped -30.48% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 20.95% vs 20.12% for RULE. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, RULE has been the lower-risk option at 9.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 20.95% return vs 20.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for RULE.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.00% for RULE.
RULE is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for RULE and 0.78% for DBO.
RULE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RULE and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer